• Our People
  • Global Presence
  • Regions
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Americas
  • Offices
    • Canada
      • Ottawa
      • Toronto
    • China
      • Beijing
      • Hong Kong
    • Luxembourg
    • Malaysia
    • Singapore
    • UK
      • Aberdeen
      • Birmingham
      • Cambridge
      • Edinburgh
      • Glasgow
      • London
      • Manchester
      • Oxford
  • Client liaison
    • Japan
    • Korea
  • Expertise
  • Services
    • Patents
    • Brands & Trade Marks
    • Designs
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Commercial IP & Contracts
    • Due Diligence
    • Freedom to Operate
    • EPO Patent Oppositions
    • European Patent Validations
    • Anti-counterfeiting
    • Open Source & Third Party Code
  • Sectors
    • Digital Transformation
      • 3D Printing
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Blockchain
      • Data & Connectivity
      • Extended Reality
      • Industry 4.0
    • Energy & Environment
    • Life Sciences
    • Agritech
    • Medical Technologies
    • Chemistry
    • Transport
    • Entertainment & Creative Industries
    • Food & Drink
    • Fashion & Retail
    • Universities & Research Bodies
    • Start-ups & Spin-outs
      • Creating value for start-ups
      • The IP driven start-up
    • Financial Services
  • About Us
    • Working with us
    • Awards
    • Corporate & Social Responsibility
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Careers
  • Insights
    • Articles
    • News
    • Events
    • Resources
    • Unified Patent Court hub
    • Beyond Brexit: European trade mark hub
    • M&C Reacts
  • Contact Us
Marks & Clerk logo
Marks & Clerk logo
Contact Us
Language
English
Our People
Global Presence
Regions
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Americas
Offices
  • Canada
    • Ottawa
    • Toronto
  • China
    • Beijing
    • Hong Kong
  • Luxembourg
  • Malaysia
  • Singapore
  • UK
    • Aberdeen
    • Birmingham
    • Cambridge
    • Edinburgh
    • Glasgow
    • London
    • Manchester
    • Oxford
Client liaison
  • Japan
  • Korea
Expertise
Services
  • Patents
  • Brands & Trade Marks
  • Designs
  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
  • Commercial IP & Contracts
  • Due Diligence
  • Freedom to Operate
  • EPO Patent Oppositions
  • European Patent Validations
  • Anti-counterfeiting
  • Open Source & Third Party Code
Sectors
  • Digital Transformation
    • 3D Printing
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Blockchain
    • Data & Connectivity
    • Extended Reality
    • Industry 4.0
  • Energy & Environment
  • Life Sciences
  • Agritech
  • Medical Technologies
  • Chemistry
  • Transport
  • Entertainment & Creative Industries
  • Food & Drink
  • Fashion & Retail
  • Universities & Research Bodies
  • Start-ups & Spin-outs
    • Creating value for start-ups
    • The IP driven start-up
  • Financial Services
About Us
  • Working with us
  • Awards
  • Corporate & Social Responsibility
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Careers
Insights
  • Articles
  • News
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Unified Patent Court hub
  • Beyond Brexit: European trade mark hub
  • M&C Reacts

The MetaBirkin and the very modern debate unfolding in Hermès International, et al v. Mason Rothschild

Hermes birkin
31 January 2023
Robecca Davey
Print
Share

A boundary testing trade mark case continues in the US between Hermès International and Mason Rothschild and we eagerly await the outcome.  This case is likely to set a precedent about how trade mark rights can extend to, and be enforced in, the virtual space / metaverse.

In this case, Hermès are claiming trade mark infringement, dilution, unfair competition and cybersquatting relating to unauthorised use of their registered trade mark ‘BIRKIN’ and the trade dress of their famous ‘BIRKIN’ handbag by Rothschild, who have promoted and sold ‘MetaBirkin’ NFTs.  The ‘MetaBirkin’ NFTs themselves relate to digital designs of handbags covered in brightly coloured fur and on this basis, Rothschild claim that they are protected under the First Amendment as the NFTs relate to an artistic work.

Some background…

In January 2022, Hermès claimed against Rothschild on the basis that consumers would be duped into believing that the ‘MetaBirkin’ NFTs sold by Rothschild were linked to, or endorsed by Hermès, when in fact, they had nothing to do with them. 

Whilst Rothschild’s ‘MetaBirkin’ NFTs correspond to digital designs of handbags covered in brightly coloured fur, and do not actually function as a handbag per se, Hermès are set to argue that:

  • Consumers would be misled into believing that the NFTs are linked to, or originate with them, i.e. that Hermès are extending their offering of ‘BIRKIN’ handbags into the Metaverse. 
  • Not only is the ‘BIRKIN’ trade mark being used here, but also digital images of handbags which resemble the shape the ‘BIRKIN’ bag (and which uses Hermès trade dress). 
  • Rothschild have also registered domain names and social media handles bearing the ‘MetaBirkin’ mark, which adds to the possibility of confusion and false association with Hermès.
  • Many fashion brands have created digital depictions of their goods in the metaverse and Hermès themselves have been making plans to enter this space since at least 2019 (prior to Rothschild’s use).  
  • The mark ‘BIRKIN’ is highly distinctive and Hermès has a large reputation for this mark.  Hermès have consistently used the ‘BIRKIN’ trade mark in relation to handbags for a number of years, allegedly generating ‘over a billion dollars of sales’ in products under this name. 

Hermès will support their case with survey evidence attesting to confusion between the ‘BIRKIN’ / ‘MetaBirkin’ marks, as well as submitting their plans and strategy to enter the metaverse and use NFTs themselves. Hermès will also support their case with evidence of sales and promotion surrounding the ‘BIRKIN’ handbag over the years.  

In its defence, Rothschild has stated that the ‘MetaBirkin’ NFTs and images of the handbags are an artistic work, and therefore, lawful actions under the First Amendment.  Rothschild claims that the First Amendment gives them “the right to make and sell art that depicts Birkin bags, just as it gave Andy Warhol the right to make and sell art depicting Campbell’s soup cans”.  In addition to this, Rothschild has stated that the ‘MetaBirkin’ project has disclaimers which explicitly state that the project is not affiliated with, or endorsed by, Hermès and that taking into account the price of the NFTs, consumers would carefully consider this and be aware of this factor prior to making their purchase.

The question is, however, whether the inclusion of the generic / weakly distinctive term “META” is sufficient to mitigate the risk of confusion or association with Hermès ‘BIRKIN’ trade mark and whether Hermès trade mark rights relating to handbags could possibly extend to digital images of the same.  It will be interesting to see whether the fact that the ‘BIRKIN’ trade mark is so well known in relation to handbags turns into a negative for Hermès in this instance.  Could it be found that consumers would understand that 2D pictures or digital images of fur covered handbags were not associated with Hermès, but merely art?  It will be interesting to see how this case pans out.  Arguably, even if Rothschild do succeed here, it sends an important warning to creators of NFTs to avoid incorporating trade marks owned by third parties into their NFTs.

Next Story
  • IP protection in collaborations: "Just Do It"
  • Peppa Pig v Wolfoo: clash of the cartoons
  • China: draft amendments to trade mark law
  • US court decision rules that use of “MetaBirkin” in relation to NFTs infringes trade mark rights in “Birkin” - Hermès v Mason Rothschild
  • From Beijing to Barrow - via Mayfair
More insights

Latest Insights

Chemistry
Article
- 24 March 2023

Preliminary position on priority published

As we reported in early 2022, the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the EPO are considering two pending referrals (G1/22 and G2/22) regarding the question of entitlement to priority. A hearing has now been set for 26 May 2023, and the Enlarged Board have now issued a preliminary opinion setting out the points to be discussed.
Read more
Cambridge - City of Innovation
Article
- 24 March 2023

Cambridge: City of Innovation - The Oxford-Cambridge Innovation Arc

Against the backdrop of the 2023 Boat Race taking place, here we consider which is the most entrepreneurial university – Oxford or Cambridge?
Read more
Quantum computing
Article
- 22 March 2023

International patent insights on quantum computing

The latest patent insight report from the European Patent Office (EPO) looks at the trends in patent filings for quantum computing, and has uncovered some interesting findings.
Read more
Marks & Clerk logo (white)
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Notice
  • Cookies
  • Legal Notices
  • Press Enquiries
  • Lexology
  • Mondaq