• Our People
  • Global Presence
  • Regions
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Americas
  • Offices
    • Canada
      • Ottawa
      • Toronto
    • China
      • Beijing
      • Hong Kong
    • Luxembourg
    • Malaysia
    • Singapore
    • UK
      • Aberdeen
      • Birmingham
      • Cambridge
      • Edinburgh
      • Glasgow
      • London
      • Manchester
      • Oxford
  • Client liaison
    • Japan
    • Korea
  • Expertise
  • Services
    • Patents
    • Brands & Trade Marks
    • Designs
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Commercial IP & Contracts
    • Due Diligence
    • Freedom to Operate
    • EPO Patent Oppositions
    • European Patent Validations
    • Anti-counterfeiting
    • Open Source & Third Party Code
  • Sectors
    • Digital Transformation
      • 3D Printing
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Blockchain
      • Data & Connectivity
      • Extended Reality
      • Industry 4.0
    • Energy & Environment
    • Life Sciences
    • Agritech
    • Medical Technologies
    • Chemistry
    • Transport
    • Entertainment & Creative Industries
    • Food & Drink
    • Fashion & Retail
    • Universities & Research Bodies
    • Start-ups & Spin-outs
      • Creating value for start-ups
      • The IP driven start-up
    • Financial Services
  • About Us
    • Working with us
    • Awards
    • Corporate & Social Responsibility
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Careers
  • Insights
    • Articles
    • News
    • Events
    • Resources
    • Unified Patent Court hub
    • Beyond Brexit: European trade mark hub
    • M&C Reacts
  • Contact Us
Marks & Clerk logo
Marks & Clerk logo
Contact Us
Language
English
Our People
Global Presence
Regions
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Americas
Offices
  • Canada
    • Ottawa
    • Toronto
  • China
    • Beijing
    • Hong Kong
  • Luxembourg
  • Malaysia
  • Singapore
  • UK
    • Aberdeen
    • Birmingham
    • Cambridge
    • Edinburgh
    • Glasgow
    • London
    • Manchester
    • Oxford
Client liaison
  • Japan
  • Korea
Expertise
Services
  • Patents
  • Brands & Trade Marks
  • Designs
  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
  • Commercial IP & Contracts
  • Due Diligence
  • Freedom to Operate
  • EPO Patent Oppositions
  • European Patent Validations
  • Anti-counterfeiting
  • Open Source & Third Party Code
Sectors
  • Digital Transformation
    • 3D Printing
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Blockchain
    • Data & Connectivity
    • Extended Reality
    • Industry 4.0
  • Energy & Environment
  • Life Sciences
  • Agritech
  • Medical Technologies
  • Chemistry
  • Transport
  • Entertainment & Creative Industries
  • Food & Drink
  • Fashion & Retail
  • Universities & Research Bodies
  • Start-ups & Spin-outs
    • Creating value for start-ups
    • The IP driven start-up
  • Financial Services
About Us
  • Working with us
  • Awards
  • Corporate & Social Responsibility
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Careers
Insights
  • Articles
  • News
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Unified Patent Court hub
  • Beyond Brexit: European trade mark hub
  • M&C Reacts

Video: Patent revocation at the UPC will replace EPO oppositions. Right?

Image: Patent revocation at the UPC will replace EPO oppositions. Right?
03 November 2022
Thomas Prock
Print
Share

Presented by Thomas Prock

UPC revocation proceedings have been compared to the EPO opposition proceedings for some time and some commentators have questioned if UPC revocation proceedings are likely to replace EPO opposition proceedings. It is certainly the case that for parties that have not started an EPO opposition within the opposition period, the ability to attack a European patent in a single revocation action will come as a welcome addition to the weapons at their disposal for dealing with an IP dispute. This video also covers:

  • Revocation at EPO opposition has effect in all 38 of the EPC member states, whereas UPC revocation can have effect in at most the 25 UPC signatory states
  • It seems unlikely that UPC revocation will completely displace EPO opposition!
  • EPO opposition proceedings can only deal with the validity of the patent, so that opponents cannot be dragged into infringement proceedings by way of counterclaim

You can learn more in our series of short UPC and UP videos here

To speak directly to a member of our UPC team please email upc@marks-clerk.com

 

Next Story
  • Video: To opt out or not opt out? That is the question
  • Video: An overview of the Unitary Patent
  • Video: An overview of the Unified Patent Court
  • Video: The new court system
  • Video: How the UPC will work alongside UK courts
More insights

Latest Insights

Chefs working in a busy kitchen
Article
- 08 February 2023

From Beijing to Barrow - via Mayfair

A trade mark dispute between high end restaurant located at the Dorchester Hotel in London and a small Chinese take away located 300 miles away.
Read more
Black bike seat on an orange frame
Article
- 07 February 2023

To see, or not to see?

There is an interesting question to be answered – to what extent does a design detail need to be visible in order for it to be a part of the scope of protection of a registered design for a complex product
Read more
Beakers and historical buildings interlaced on a Cambridge backdrop
Article
- 07 February 2023

Cambridge: City of Innovation - 70 Years of the Cambridge DNA Revolution

Cambridge has laid claim to many historic scientific achievements in the 800 years since the foundation of its University. Amongst them, the the elucidation of the double helix structure of DNA, which took place 70 years ago.
Read more
Marks & Clerk logo (white)
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Notice
  • Cookies
  • Legal Notices
  • Lexology
  • Mondaq