• Our People
  • Global Presence
  • Regions
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Americas
  • Offices
    • Canada
      • Ottawa
      • Toronto
    • China
      • Beijing
      • Hong Kong
    • Luxembourg
    • Malaysia
    • Singapore
    • UK
      • Aberdeen
      • Birmingham
      • Cambridge
      • Edinburgh
      • Glasgow
      • London
      • Manchester
      • Oxford
  • Client liaison
    • Japan
    • Korea
  • Expertise
  • Services
    • Patents
    • Brands & Trade Marks
    • Designs
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Commercial IP & Contracts
    • Due Diligence
    • Freedom to Operate
    • EPO Patent Oppositions
    • European Patent Validations
    • Anti-counterfeiting
    • Open Source & Third Party Code
  • Sectors
    • Digital Transformation
      • 3D Printing
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Blockchain
      • Data & Connectivity
      • Extended Reality
      • Industry 4.0
    • Energy & Environment
    • Life Sciences
    • Agritech
    • Medical Technologies
    • Chemistry
    • Transport
    • Entertainment & Creative Industries
    • Food & Drink
    • Fashion & Retail
    • Universities & Research Bodies
    • Start-ups & Spin-outs
      • Creating value for start-ups
      • The IP driven start-up
    • Financial Services
  • About Us
    • Working with us
    • Awards
    • Corporate & Social Responsibility
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Careers
  • Insights
    • Articles
    • News
    • Events
    • Resources
    • Unified Patent Court hub
    • Beyond Brexit: European trade mark hub
    • M&C Reacts
  • Contact Us
Marks & Clerk logo
Marks & Clerk logo
Contact Us
Language
English Français
Our People
Global Presence
Regions
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Americas
Offices
  • Canada
    • Ottawa
    • Toronto
  • China
    • Beijing
    • Hong Kong
  • Luxembourg
  • Malaysia
  • Singapore
  • UK
    • Aberdeen
    • Birmingham
    • Cambridge
    • Edinburgh
    • Glasgow
    • London
    • Manchester
    • Oxford
Client liaison
  • Japan
  • Korea
Expertise
Services
  • Patents
  • Brands & Trade Marks
  • Designs
  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
  • Commercial IP & Contracts
  • Due Diligence
  • Freedom to Operate
  • EPO Patent Oppositions
  • European Patent Validations
  • Anti-counterfeiting
  • Open Source & Third Party Code
Sectors
  • Digital Transformation
    • 3D Printing
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Blockchain
    • Data & Connectivity
    • Extended Reality
    • Industry 4.0
  • Energy & Environment
  • Life Sciences
  • Agritech
  • Medical Technologies
  • Chemistry
  • Transport
  • Entertainment & Creative Industries
  • Food & Drink
  • Fashion & Retail
  • Universities & Research Bodies
  • Start-ups & Spin-outs
    • Creating value for start-ups
    • The IP driven start-up
  • Financial Services
About Us
  • Working with us
  • Awards
  • Corporate & Social Responsibility
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Careers
Insights
  • Articles
  • News
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Unified Patent Court hub
  • Beyond Brexit: European trade mark hub
  • M&C Reacts

E-scooters - manufacturers continue to invest despite rules against road-use

E-scooters
12 January 2022
Dominic O'Connor
Print
Share

In the UK at the moment you can’t use your own e-scooter on the road, but a government trial could change all that. In the meantime, e-scooter manufacturers are marketing hard to consumers and busily using intellectual property to protect their creations. We take a look at what has been happening.

You may have noticed someone using an e-scooter recently (the stand-while-riding type). In recent months I would regularly see a fellow-commuter waiting on the platform for the train holding his e-scooter. Perhaps you have thought “would one make sense for me?”

Judging by their increasingly widespread use, and conceptual similarities to electric bikes, you may be forgiven for thinking that they can be freely ridden on roads. This is, however, not the case.

Under current rules, e-scooters can’t be used on roads because most of them don’t have rear red lights, indicator lights and number plates. Besides this, e-scooters are, at present, classified as “motor vehicles”, which means for road use they would need to be insured and taxed, among other things, which is difficult in practice.

The UK government is currently conducting e-scooter trials to help it decide whether a change in rules is needed. The trials are for rental e-scooters only, and are limited to certain geographic areas. You may be able to rent one as part of the trial scheme. Currently, however, you can’t use your own e-scooter in public areas (including roads), but only on private land.

This has not stopped e-scooter manufacturers from intense marketing of e-scooters to consumers in the UK, with a wide choice available and typical prices ranging from around £100 to around £1000. Big-name manufacturers are involved like Lamborghini and also Segway. No doubt much of the investment from manufacturers is driven by the looser rules that other countries have on e-scooter use on roads, notably the US and much of Europe.

It is interesting to look at what evidence there is of manufacturers taking steps to protect their investments using intellectual property. For example, US company Razor has been active in this area, and has been looking to protect with patents different aspects of its scooters, ranging from airless tires to battery packs and anti-theft mechanisms. Razor has also been busy when it comes to registering the visual appearance of its electric scooters using registered designs. Much of this effort has been aimed at protection in China where there is a growing sense that intellectual property rights are being taken more seriously, and non-Chinese companies can be successful in enforcing their rights (read here about Jaguar Land Rover’s 2017 court win in China over its Evoque model against a local Chinese manufacturer.)

Chinese e-scooter maker Xiaomi has also been very active in seeking to obtain patents and registered designs, and one particular area it has been looking at is the folding mechanism allowing the vertical stem (the part that has the handlebars) to be folded down flat to the deck. This of course allows the scooter to be collapsed for ease of carrying. The long-lasting success of folding Brompton bikes shows the potential rewards for makers who get this right. (See our article here on a court case involving copyright protection for Brompton bikes.)

The outcome of the government’s trial will be crucial. The trial is intended to gauge the benefits and risks of e-scooters, and was originally expected to run until summer 2022, but reportedly is now being extended to November 2022, after which a decision on whether to legalize use of privately-owned scooters on roads is expected.

If the decision is to open the roads to e-scooters, sales could really take off: with their light weight and small folded-down size, e-scooters have the edge over electric bikes for portability and convenience.

Watch this space.

Next Story
  • IP protection in collaborations: "Just Do It"
  • Driving UK AM technology growth
  • What is the patentability of Quantum Algorithms?
  • ‘Hy’ and mighty - harnessing the power of hydrogen to shape the energy transition
  • To see, or not to see?
More insights

Latest Insights

News
- 16 March 2023

Chris Hemingway of Marks & Clerk Malaysia recognised by Asia IP as a top practitioner

We are delighted to announce that Chris Hemingway, Director (Office Managing Partner) at Marks & Clerk Malaysia has been recognised by Asia IP as a top practitioner in his field.
Read more
Black Nike Air Force Ones with Tiffany blue tick, against a Tiffany blue background
Article
- 15 March 2023

IP protection in collaborations: "Just Do It"

2022 saw a growing rise in athleisure, with many brands recognising the business opportunities it brings, including reaching new markets and increasing market share through their own performance lines or through collaborations with existing active wear brands.
Read more
Article
- 13 March 2023

Peppa Pig v Wolfoo: clash of the cartoons

In its recent decision in Entertainment One UK Ltd & Anor v Sconnect Co Ltd & Ors, the High Court considered whether English courts could have jurisdiction in cases involving intellectual property infringements on internationally accessible internet platforms.
Read more
Marks & Clerk logo (white)
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Notice
  • Cookies
  • Legal Notices
  • Press Enquiries
  • Lexology
  • Mondaq