• Our People
  • Global Presence
  • Regions
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Americas
  • Offices
    • Canada
      • Ottawa
      • Toronto
    • China
      • Beijing
      • Hong Kong
    • Luxembourg
    • Malaysia
    • Singapore
    • UK
      • Aberdeen
      • Birmingham
      • Cambridge
      • Edinburgh
      • Glasgow
      • London
      • Manchester
      • Oxford
  • Client liaison
    • Japan
    • Korea
  • Expertise
  • Services
    • Patents
    • Brands & Trade Marks
    • Designs
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Commercial IP & Contracts
    • Due Diligence
    • Freedom to Operate
    • EPO Patent Oppositions
    • European Patent Validations
    • Anti-counterfeiting
    • Open Source & Third Party Code
  • Sectors
    • Digital Transformation
      • 3D Printing
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Blockchain
      • Data & Connectivity
      • Extended Reality
      • Industry 4.0
    • Energy & Environment
    • Life Sciences
    • Agritech
    • Medical Technologies
    • Chemistry
    • Transport
    • Entertainment & Creative Industries
    • Food & Drink
    • Fashion & Retail
    • Universities & Research Bodies
    • Start-ups & Spin-outs
      • Creating value for start-ups
      • The IP driven start-up
    • Financial Services
  • About Us
    • Working with us
    • Awards
    • Corporate & Social Responsibility
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Careers
  • Insights
    • Articles
    • News
    • Events
    • Resources
    • Unified Patent Court hub
    • Beyond Brexit: European trade mark hub
    • M&C Reacts
  • Contact Us
Marks & Clerk logo
Marks & Clerk logo
Contact Us
Language
English
Our People
Global Presence
Regions
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Americas
Offices
  • Canada
    • Ottawa
    • Toronto
  • China
    • Beijing
    • Hong Kong
  • Luxembourg
  • Malaysia
  • Singapore
  • UK
    • Aberdeen
    • Birmingham
    • Cambridge
    • Edinburgh
    • Glasgow
    • London
    • Manchester
    • Oxford
Client liaison
  • Japan
  • Korea
Expertise
Services
  • Patents
  • Brands & Trade Marks
  • Designs
  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
  • Commercial IP & Contracts
  • Due Diligence
  • Freedom to Operate
  • EPO Patent Oppositions
  • European Patent Validations
  • Anti-counterfeiting
  • Open Source & Third Party Code
Sectors
  • Digital Transformation
    • 3D Printing
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Blockchain
    • Data & Connectivity
    • Extended Reality
    • Industry 4.0
  • Energy & Environment
  • Life Sciences
  • Agritech
  • Medical Technologies
  • Chemistry
  • Transport
  • Entertainment & Creative Industries
  • Food & Drink
  • Fashion & Retail
  • Universities & Research Bodies
  • Start-ups & Spin-outs
    • Creating value for start-ups
    • The IP driven start-up
  • Financial Services
About Us
  • Working with us
  • Awards
  • Corporate & Social Responsibility
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Careers
Insights
  • Articles
  • News
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Unified Patent Court hub
  • Beyond Brexit: European trade mark hub
  • M&C Reacts

9. Expansion and growth

05 January 2023
Robert Lind
Print
Share

Expansion and growth will usually entail recruitment.  When identifying talent it might be worth taking into account any IP experience that applicants have had and particularly experience in the patenting process.  If a new hire’s experience of patents has been relatively painless, they may not only be likely to identify patentable innovations but will be likely to push these forward and remain engaged throughout the process.

IP education of new joiners will be an important part of the process.  New joiners should be made aware of the IP strategy and of the company’s objectives.  Online IP training may be an efficient way to bring them up to speed quickly.  Of course, the need for confidentiality should be driven home to reduce the risk that key IP is disclosed prematurely, particular when new joiners are coming directly from an academic environment in which publications are a key focus.

Expansion and growth will likely include an increase in the quantity of IP assets.  Assuming that you have in place an efficient process to identify protectable innovations (patents, designs etc.), and you don’t have unlimited financial resources to invest in IP, you will likely need a process to filter submissions and identify those that are worth seeking to register.  Commercial relevance will of course be key.  But also think about getting some quick wins, that is IP assets that might be registered relatively painlessly and therefore cheaply.  For patents, this means innovations that are seen as very clearly novel and inventive.  This can be useful in building up the IP balance sheet.  A handy reference to assess whether or not to pursue patent protection for an invention is provided in the Appendix.

Inevitably, filtering out those assets that will not be pursued to registration may result in disgruntled inventors.  If an inventor ends up having all of his or her proposals rejected, he or she might be less likely to make proposals in the future.  This requires careful balancing, and at the very least praise and encouragement.

More IP assets will of course result in the need for more internal resources.  This should be factored in when planning recruitment and when budgeting for future IP spend.  Some re-budgeting will likely be necessary.  This will be a tricky balance as growth will likely entail increased spending on salaries and the like, putting pressure on the IP budget. 

Evaluating your potentially protectable inventions and designs is not limited to a pre-filing exercise and should be undertaken regularly to ensure money is being spent on commercially valuable IP assets as your company grows. For example, perhaps the technology area of a patent application is no longer important to the business.  Alternatively, maybe technology has developed which makes the IP asset easy to work around, or the geographical market for the invention changed.  All of these factors should be considered regularly when evaluating an IP portfolio and as your company grows.  Where an IP asset is no longer valuable or relevant, it may be possible to redirect costs to more important IP assets (e.g. by abandoning patent applications that are no longer relevant).  Alternatively, these assets can be maintained as a “patent thicket” to deter competitors, or assigned or licensed out to other companies to generate income.

Next Story
  • To see, or not to see?
  • Cambridge: City of Innovation - 70 Years of the Cambridge DNA Revolution
  • Marks & Spencer lights up Aldi design infringement
  • Change to UKIPO practice where no UK representative has been appointed
  • Key differences between the EU and UK TM opposition systems
More insights

Latest Insights

Black bike seat on an orange frame
Article
- 07 February 2023

To see, or not to see?

There is an interesting question to be answered – to what extent does a design detail need to be visible in order for it to be a part of the scope of protection of a registered design for a complex product
Read more
Beakers and historical buildings interlaced on a Cambridge backdrop
Article
- 07 February 2023

Cambridge: City of Innovation - 70 Years of the Cambridge DNA Revolution

Cambridge has laid claim to many historic scientific achievements in the 800 years since the foundation of its University. Amongst them, the the elucidation of the double helix structure of DNA, which took place 70 years ago.
Read more
two festive gin bottles glowing with gold pieces floating inside, sitting alongside two out of focus festive cocktails
Article
- 03 February 2023

Marks & Spencer lights up Aldi design infringement

Marks & Spencer has successfully enforced several UK registered designs against Aldi’s copycat products in a decision that should provide welcome reassurance for designers seeking to use registered designs to protect their products.
Read more
Marks & Clerk logo (white)
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Notice
  • Cookies
  • Legal Notices
  • Lexology
  • Mondaq