• Our People
  • Global Presence
  • Regions
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Americas
  • Offices
    • Canada
      • Ottawa
      • Toronto
    • China
      • Beijing
      • Hong Kong
    • France
      • Paris
      • Sophia Antipolis
    • Luxembourg
    • Malaysia
    • Singapore
    • UK
      • Aberdeen
      • Birmingham
      • Cambridge
      • Edinburgh
      • Glasgow
      • London
      • Manchester
      • Oxford
  • Client liaison
    • Japan
    • Korea
  • Expertise
  • Services
    • Patents
    • Brands & Trade Marks
    • Designs
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Commercial IP & Contracts
    • Due Diligence
    • Freedom to Operate
    • EPO Patent Oppositions
    • European Patent Validations
    • Anti-counterfeiting
    • Open Source & Third Party Code
  • Sectors
    • Energy & Environment
    • Life Sciences
    • Agritech
    • Medical Technologies
    • Chemistry
    • Transport
    • Entertainment & Creative Industries
    • Food & Drink
    • Fashion & Retail
    • Universities & Research Bodies
    • Start-ups & Spin-outs
    • Digital Transformation
      • 3D Printing
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Blockchain
      • Data & Connectivity
      • Extended Reality
      • Industry 4.0
  • About Us
    • Working with us
    • Awards
    • Corporate & Social Responsibility
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Careers
  • Articles
    • Events
    • M&C Reacts
    • European Trade Mark Hub
    • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
    • All publications
  • Contact Us
Marks & Clerk logo (magenta)
Marks & Clerk logo (magenta)
Contact Us
Language
English 中文(简体)
Our People
Global Presence
Regions
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Americas
Offices
  • Canada
    • Ottawa
    • Toronto
  • China
    • Beijing
    • Hong Kong
  • France
    • Paris
    • Sophia Antipolis
  • Luxembourg
  • Malaysia
  • Singapore
  • UK
    • Aberdeen
    • Birmingham
    • Cambridge
    • Edinburgh
    • Glasgow
    • London
    • Manchester
    • Oxford
Client liaison
  • Japan
  • Korea
Expertise
Services
  • Patents
  • Brands & Trade Marks
  • Designs
  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
  • Commercial IP & Contracts
  • Due Diligence
  • Freedom to Operate
  • EPO Patent Oppositions
  • European Patent Validations
  • Anti-counterfeiting
  • Open Source & Third Party Code
Sectors
  • Energy & Environment
  • Life Sciences
  • Agritech
  • Medical Technologies
  • Chemistry
  • Transport
  • Entertainment & Creative Industries
  • Food & Drink
  • Fashion & Retail
  • Universities & Research Bodies
  • Start-ups & Spin-outs
  • Digital Transformation
    • 3D Printing
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Blockchain
    • Data & Connectivity
    • Extended Reality
    • Industry 4.0
About Us
  • Working with us
  • Awards
  • Corporate & Social Responsibility
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Careers
Articles
  • Events
  • M&C Reacts
  • European Trade Mark Hub
  • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
  • All publications

Shanghai Intellectual Property Court ruled for Casio’s calculator design

21 June 2021
Print
Share

On 23 April 2021, the Shanghai Intellectual Property Court (“Court”) announced judgments for ten cases involving intellectual property disputes including, inter alia, a design patent infringement case. The Court found that infringement was established, granting an injunction against future infringement and a monetary damage of RMB 200,000. The comments of the Court in this case shed some light on how similar designs are to be determined in the field of electronic calculators.

The plaintiff in this case is Casio Computer Co., Ltd. (“Casio”). The design at issue is Chinese Patent No. ZL201430094864.5, entitled “Electronic Calculator”, granted to Casio in 2014. The defendants are Shantou Eates Electronic Industrial Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Zongtong Industrial Co., Ltd. The former is the manufacturer of the allegedly infringing calculator, and the latter is the seller thereof. For ease of reference, the allegedly infringing calculator and the design at issue are reproduced below:

Design drawing of Casio calculator alongside photograph of allegedly infringing calculator - navigation keys are highlighted with a red boxLeft: Casio calculator design. Right: allegedly infringing design. Image provided by IP ForeFront

According to the Court, the front side of a calculator is the part that provides the most significant visual impact to a consumer. In respect of the design of the front side, the Court finds there is still certain degree of freedom for designers in terms of the specific shape of the functional keys and the layout thereof. As such, the layout of the keys in the design at issue is not necessarily a conventional design.

The Court concludes that the design of the allegedly infringing calculator and the design at issue constitute similar designs, in that the design of the allegedly infringing calculator is essentially the same as the design at issue in terms of the overall visual impacts they make. In reaching its conclusion, the Court specifically comments on the design of navigation keys (highlighted in red in the picture above). According to the Court, whilst the navigation key of the allegedly infringing calculator differs from that of the design at issue, the difference is merely an insignificant modification in view of its location and proportion to other parts of the calculators. Accordingly, the Court finds that the navigation key of the allegedly infringing calculator cannot distinguish it from the design at issue.

Next Story
  • Damages – no turning back
  • No Offence: Criminal Sanctions and Design Rights
  • Federal Court of Canada requires CIPO to apply IPIC’s framework to Computer-Implemented Inventions
  • Pre-loved Island
  • Case study: Beijing IP Court issues US$ 750,000 penalty for Joint Infringing Activities
More insights

Latest Insights

Photo: man using a calculator and holding money
Article
- 29 June 2022

Damages – no turning back

The winner in an intellectual property infringement action will normally ask the court for an order for procedures to take place so that a proper level of compensation or restitution can be calculated. There are two different ways in which that money can be calculated, namely an inquiry as to damages, and an account of profits.
Read more
Article
- 28 June 2022

No Offence: Criminal Sanctions and Design Rights

In the UK, intellectual property (IP) rights are generally protected as a civil law matter through litigation in the civil courts.
Read more
flags
Article
- 28 June 2022

New members of the Madrid Protocol international trade mark system

Jamaica, Chile and Cape Verde and have all recently acceded to the Madrid Protocol international trade mark system, becoming the 110th, 111th and 112th members of the system.
Read more
Marks & Clerk logo (white)
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Notice
  • Cookies
  • Legal Notices
  • Lexology
  • Mondaq