• Our People
  • Global Presence
  • Regions
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Americas
  • Offices
    • Canada
      • Ottawa
      • Toronto
    • China
      • Beijing
      • Hong Kong
    • Luxembourg
    • Malaysia
    • Singapore
    • UK
      • Aberdeen
      • Birmingham
      • Cambridge
      • Edinburgh
      • Glasgow
      • London
      • Manchester
      • Oxford
  • Client liaison
    • Japan
    • Korea
  • Expertise
  • Services
    • Patents
    • Brands & Trade Marks
    • Designs
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Commercial IP & Contracts
    • Due Diligence
    • Freedom to Operate
    • EPO Patent Oppositions
    • European Patent Validations
    • Anti-counterfeiting
    • Open Source & Third Party Code
  • Sectors
    • Digital Transformation
      • 3D Printing
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Blockchain
      • Data & Connectivity
      • Extended Reality
      • Industry 4.0
    • Energy & Environment
    • Life Sciences
    • Agritech
    • Medical Technologies
    • Chemistry
    • Transport
    • Entertainment & Creative Industries
    • Food & Drink
    • Fashion & Retail
    • Universities & Research Bodies
    • Start-ups & Spin-outs
      • Creating value for start-ups
      • The IP driven start-up
    • Financial Services
  • About Us
    • Working with us
    • Awards
    • Corporate & Social Responsibility
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Careers
  • Insights
    • Articles
    • News
    • Events
    • Resources
    • Unified Patent Court hub
    • Beyond Brexit: European trade mark hub
    • M&C Reacts
  • Contact Us
Marks & Clerk logo
Marks & Clerk logo
Contact Us
Language
English 日本語
Our People
Global Presence
Regions
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Americas
Offices
  • Canada
    • Ottawa
    • Toronto
  • China
    • Beijing
    • Hong Kong
  • Luxembourg
  • Malaysia
  • Singapore
  • UK
    • Aberdeen
    • Birmingham
    • Cambridge
    • Edinburgh
    • Glasgow
    • London
    • Manchester
    • Oxford
Client liaison
  • Japan
  • Korea
Expertise
Services
  • Patents
  • Brands & Trade Marks
  • Designs
  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
  • Commercial IP & Contracts
  • Due Diligence
  • Freedom to Operate
  • EPO Patent Oppositions
  • European Patent Validations
  • Anti-counterfeiting
  • Open Source & Third Party Code
Sectors
  • Digital Transformation
    • 3D Printing
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Blockchain
    • Data & Connectivity
    • Extended Reality
    • Industry 4.0
  • Energy & Environment
  • Life Sciences
  • Agritech
  • Medical Technologies
  • Chemistry
  • Transport
  • Entertainment & Creative Industries
  • Food & Drink
  • Fashion & Retail
  • Universities & Research Bodies
  • Start-ups & Spin-outs
    • Creating value for start-ups
    • The IP driven start-up
  • Financial Services
About Us
  • Working with us
  • Awards
  • Corporate & Social Responsibility
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Careers
Insights
  • Articles
  • News
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Unified Patent Court hub
  • Beyond Brexit: European trade mark hub
  • M&C Reacts

Return to sender, address unknown

26 January 2023
David Kemp
Print
Share

Hot off the press is the long awaited guidance from the UKIPO on service of documents in contentious proceedings upon parties who do not have a UK address for service.

With immediate effect, the UKIPO will now ask for a UK address for service (AFS) if the party in question intends to defend the proceedings. The new AFS must be entered onto the register within one month of the UKIPO’s request, failing which the application or registration will be deemed abandoned subject to any extenuating circumstances and the Registrar’s discretion. What this means in practice is that if you are a trade mark owner whose trade mark has been opposed or challenged, and you have missed the critical deadline to file your defence after the UKIPO served the opposition/cancellation papers on you outside of the UK, fret not as you will be given a further opportunity to remedy this. If, in the future, your UK trade mark application or registration is ever challenged and you intend to defend but do not have a UK AFS, you must ensure that a valid UK correspondence address is entered in a timely fashion.

Being one of his own cases, the background to this was authoritatively covered by Gareth Jenkins in his article entitled Need UK representation? A Marco Polo Journey. Issued today, Tribunal Practice Notice 2/2023 sets out new rules for service of documents in inter-partes proceedings where trade mark applications or registrations having a non-UK address for service must be replaced with a valid UK address. It relates mainly to International trade mark registrations designating the UK, as well as disputes involving registered designs, but will also include cancellation actions brought against comparable UK registrations derived from EU trade marks and designs as part of the Brexit transitional arrangements (assuming of course that a UK AFS has not already been entered against those comparable registrations).

Prior to today’s TPN the Registrar deemed service to non-UK addresses to be effective in triggering the two-month defence deadline; applicants or proprietors often missed this crucial deadline, resulting in a loss of rights. For example, in the case which prompted an appeal to the Appointed Person and the subsequent review of the UKIPO’s own practice (Tradeix Ltd v New Holland Ventures Pty Ltd (BL O/681/22) the UKIPO’s documents were sent to the proprietor’s registered Australian address which was their accountant’s address. However, owing to Covid lockdown measures in Australia, their accountant’s office was closed for the duration of the proceedings. As a result, a defence was not filed and the proprietor’s registration was cancelled. Having considered the matter, the Appointed Person ruled in August that the Registrar does not have any power to serve outside of the jurisdiction, and cannot validly effect service without having first obtained a valid UK AFS for the challenged right.

Late last year many UK practitioners (including myself) were informed by the UKIPO that, because of the Appointed Person’s decision, oppositions, revocations and the like had been suspended whilst the UKIPO reviewed their practice. The TPN is long awaited and it is pleasing that we now have clarity on the AFS issue. On the other hand, the new practice will give applicants or proprietors a second bite at the cherry having previously missed their defence deadlines – which is great if your rights have been challenged but a little frustrating if you are on the opposite side.

This change in practice emphasises the importance of appointing a UK qualified representative against registered trade marks and designs having effect in the UK, to ensure that there is no confusion, delay or loss of important communications from the UKIPO such as cancellation requests or notifications of newly filed conflicting third party applications. A UK representative will also be able to provide appropriate and qualified advice, and update you quickly in relation to new UKIPO practices and guidelines. Finally, appointing a UK representative now will avoid any delays in the processing of applications to appoint representatives in the run up to the December 2023 deadline for the owners of all UK TM registrations to appoint a UK representative.

Just so you know, Marks & Clerk has eight offices in the UK that can be designated as an AFS and so there are plenty of representatives to choose from!

Next Story
  • Preliminary position on priority published
  • Cambridge: City of Innovation - The Oxford-Cambridge Innovation Arc
  • International patent insights on quantum computing
  • InterDigital v Lenovo: The latest FRAND judgment
  • Cambridge: City of Innovation - The 'beer summit' that generated a genomic revolution
More insights

Latest Insights

Chemistry
Article
- 24 March 2023

Preliminary position on priority published

As we reported in early 2022, the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the EPO are considering two pending referrals (G1/22 and G2/22) regarding the question of entitlement to priority. A hearing has now been set for 26 May 2023, and the Enlarged Board have now issued a preliminary opinion setting out the points to be discussed.
Read more
Cambridge - City of Innovation
Article
- 24 March 2023

Cambridge: City of Innovation - The Oxford-Cambridge Innovation Arc

Against the backdrop of the 2023 Boat Race taking place, here we consider which is the most entrepreneurial university – Oxford or Cambridge?
Read more
Quantum computing
Article
- 22 March 2023

International patent insights on quantum computing

The latest patent insight report from the European Patent Office (EPO) looks at the trends in patent filings for quantum computing, and has uncovered some interesting findings.
Read more
Marks & Clerk logo (white)
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Notice
  • Cookies
  • Legal Notices
  • Press Enquiries
  • Lexology
  • Mondaq