• Our People
  • Global Presence
  • Regions
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Americas
  • Offices
    • Canada
      • Ottawa
      • Toronto
    • China
      • Beijing
      • Hong Kong
    • Luxembourg
    • Malaysia
    • Singapore
    • UK
      • Aberdeen
      • Birmingham
      • Cambridge
      • Edinburgh
      • Glasgow
      • London
      • Manchester
      • Oxford
  • Client liaison
    • Japan
    • Korea
  • Expertise
  • Services
    • Patents
    • Brands & Trade Marks
    • Designs
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Commercial IP & Contracts
    • Due Diligence
    • Freedom to Operate
    • EPO Patent Oppositions
    • European Patent Validations
    • Anti-counterfeiting
    • Open Source & Third Party Code
  • Sectors
    • Energy & Environment
    • Life Sciences
    • Agritech
    • Medical Technologies
    • Chemistry
    • Transport
    • Entertainment & Creative Industries
    • Food & Drink
    • Fashion & Retail
    • Universities & Research Bodies
    • Start-ups & Spin-outs
    • Digital Transformation
      • 3D Printing
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Blockchain
      • Data & Connectivity
      • Extended Reality
      • Industry 4.0
  • About Us
    • Working with us
    • Awards
    • Corporate & Social Responsibility
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Careers
  • Insights
    • Articles
    • News
    • Events
    • Resources
    • M&C Reacts
  • Contact Us
Marks & Clerk logo
Marks & Clerk logo
Contact Us
Language
English
Our People
Global Presence
Regions
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Americas
Offices
  • Canada
    • Ottawa
    • Toronto
  • China
    • Beijing
    • Hong Kong
  • Luxembourg
  • Malaysia
  • Singapore
  • UK
    • Aberdeen
    • Birmingham
    • Cambridge
    • Edinburgh
    • Glasgow
    • London
    • Manchester
    • Oxford
Client liaison
  • Japan
  • Korea
Expertise
Services
  • Patents
  • Brands & Trade Marks
  • Designs
  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
  • Commercial IP & Contracts
  • Due Diligence
  • Freedom to Operate
  • EPO Patent Oppositions
  • European Patent Validations
  • Anti-counterfeiting
  • Open Source & Third Party Code
Sectors
  • Energy & Environment
  • Life Sciences
  • Agritech
  • Medical Technologies
  • Chemistry
  • Transport
  • Entertainment & Creative Industries
  • Food & Drink
  • Fashion & Retail
  • Universities & Research Bodies
  • Start-ups & Spin-outs
  • Digital Transformation
    • 3D Printing
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Blockchain
    • Data & Connectivity
    • Extended Reality
    • Industry 4.0
About Us
  • Working with us
  • Awards
  • Corporate & Social Responsibility
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Careers
Insights
  • Articles
  • News
  • Events
  • Resources
  • M&C Reacts

Putting the brakes on intellectual property infringers

12 August 2020
Dominic O'Connor
Print
Share

In a decision published on 9th August 2020, the F1 stewards delivered a verdict fining Racing Point 15 points and 400,000 Euros. The reason? Copying the brake ducts from last year’s championship-winning Mercedes.

Renault raised a complaint about Racing Point’s brake ducts (a part which directs cooling air into the brakes) after the Styrian, Hungarian and British Grand Prix, and that complaint has now been upheld by the stewards.

Under the F1 rules teams are allowed to use certain parts of the car which they did not themselves design – for example the engine and suspension – but other parts must be designed by the team itself. In this case, the brake ducts were judged not to have been designed by Racing Point, in breach of the current regulations.

However, looking a little deeper, Racing Point had not perhaps behaved quite as badly as the headline verdict suggests.

In the 2019 season they had been buying brake ducts from Mercedes as was allowed under the rules at the time, and had also received design (CAD) data for the ducts from Mercedes. Racing Point argued that they used that data to design their own front brake ducts which they applied to their 2019 car. They did not however use the data for their rear brake ducts.

In 2020 the rules changed, forbidding brake ducts from other constructors to be used. The stewards’ decision found that Racing Point’s front brake ducts were allowed because, although designed using Mercedes data, they had been used in 2019, but the rear ducts were not.

As is so often the case, the devil is in the detail of the rules. In the world of F1, teams can deal with copycats by falling back on the sport’s regulations, but out in the real world designers would be well-advised to ensure their designs are sufficiently protected from copycats by patents, registered or unregistered designs or other intellectual property.

Next Story
  • Cook v Boston – practicalities relating to the Shorter Trial Scheme and costs budgeting
  • Patenting DLT innovations in Europe
  • Applications of DLTs
  • Windtech International: Will European IP be the key for overseas countries in meeting their Net Zero targets?
  • What makes a good Patent Attorney?
More insights

Latest Insights

Photo: Gavel and Justice Scale
Article
- 11 August 2022

Cook v Boston – practicalities relating to the Shorter Trial Scheme and costs budgeting

The Shorter Trial Scheme (STS) was set up with the purpose of providing parties with an avenue to achieve earlier, shorter trials for reasonably sized litigation at a proportionate cost. The judgment in proceedings between Cook and Boston contains a few practical points on the STS and other case management issues.
Read more
News
- 10 August 2022

Marks & Clerk’s trade mark team also celebrates exam success!

In addition to our excellent patent team results in July, we are also thrilled to announce that several members of the Marks & Clerk Trade Mark team are enjoying exam success.
Read more
Blockchain/cryptocurrency concept: 3D cubes
Article
- 05 August 2022

Patenting DLT innovations in Europe

In Europe, inventions that utilise distributed ledger technology will generally fall under the heading of “computer-implemented inventions (CIIs).”
Read more
Marks & Clerk logo (white)
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Notice
  • Cookies
  • Legal Notices
  • Lexology
  • Mondaq