• Our People
  • Global Presence
  • Regions
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Americas
  • Offices
    • Canada
      • Ottawa
      • Toronto
    • China
      • Beijing
      • Hong Kong
    • Luxembourg
    • Malaysia
    • Singapore
    • UK
      • Aberdeen
      • Birmingham
      • Cambridge
      • Edinburgh
      • Glasgow
      • London
      • Manchester
      • Oxford
  • Client liaison
    • Japan
    • Korea
  • Expertise
  • Services
    • Patents
    • Brands & Trade Marks
    • Designs
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Commercial IP & Contracts
    • Due Diligence
    • Freedom to Operate
    • EPO Patent Oppositions
    • European Patent Validations
    • Anti-counterfeiting
    • Open Source & Third Party Code
  • Sectors
    • Digital Transformation
      • 3D Printing
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Blockchain
      • Data & Connectivity
      • Extended Reality
      • Industry 4.0
    • Energy & Environment
    • Life Sciences
    • Agritech
    • Medical Technologies
    • Chemistry
    • Transport
    • Entertainment & Creative Industries
    • Food & Drink
    • Fashion & Retail
    • Universities & Research Bodies
    • Start-ups & Spin-outs
      • Creating value for start-ups
      • The IP driven start-up
    • Financial Services
  • About Us
    • Working with us
    • Awards
    • Corporate & Social Responsibility
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Careers
  • Insights
    • Articles
    • News
    • Events
    • Resources
    • Unified Patent Court hub
    • Beyond Brexit: European trade mark hub
    • M&C Reacts
  • Contact Us
Marks & Clerk logo
Marks & Clerk logo
Contact Us
Language
English
Our People
Global Presence
Regions
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Americas
Offices
  • Canada
    • Ottawa
    • Toronto
  • China
    • Beijing
    • Hong Kong
  • Luxembourg
  • Malaysia
  • Singapore
  • UK
    • Aberdeen
    • Birmingham
    • Cambridge
    • Edinburgh
    • Glasgow
    • London
    • Manchester
    • Oxford
Client liaison
  • Japan
  • Korea
Expertise
Services
  • Patents
  • Brands & Trade Marks
  • Designs
  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
  • Commercial IP & Contracts
  • Due Diligence
  • Freedom to Operate
  • EPO Patent Oppositions
  • European Patent Validations
  • Anti-counterfeiting
  • Open Source & Third Party Code
Sectors
  • Digital Transformation
    • 3D Printing
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Blockchain
    • Data & Connectivity
    • Extended Reality
    • Industry 4.0
  • Energy & Environment
  • Life Sciences
  • Agritech
  • Medical Technologies
  • Chemistry
  • Transport
  • Entertainment & Creative Industries
  • Food & Drink
  • Fashion & Retail
  • Universities & Research Bodies
  • Start-ups & Spin-outs
    • Creating value for start-ups
    • The IP driven start-up
  • Financial Services
About Us
  • Working with us
  • Awards
  • Corporate & Social Responsibility
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Careers
Insights
  • Articles
  • News
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Unified Patent Court hub
  • Beyond Brexit: European trade mark hub
  • M&C Reacts

Possible sea change for safe harbours in Canada – Canadian Government launches Consultation on a Modern Copyright Framework for Online Intermediaries

15 April 2021
Catherine Lovrics
Print
Share

The liability and obligations of online intermediaries are currently under review in Canada.  This is with a view to ensure that Canada’s copyright framework for online intermediaries reflects the evolving digital world. With widespread distribution of copyright content on the internet, and a diversification of online intermediaries, the government is revisiting to what extent the copyright framework for online intermediaries still achieves its underlying objectives. 

In Canada, intermediaries that primarily enable acts of infringement can be liable for infringement; whereas intermediaries have safe harbour if they merely provide the technical means by which others infringe copyright, using the intermediaries’ services.

Rightsholders have encouraged modifying the current regime, in part over concerns of lost remuneration for uses of content online and challenges to enforcement. The intent being to incentivize platforms that enable content sharing to pay rightsholders for the use of content. By contrast, others argue the current regime is appropriate, and fosters an open internet, innovation, and economic growth.

The consultation paper sets out various options, including:

  1. recalibrating or clarifying intermediaries' safe harbour, including:
    1. reconsidering how intermediaries' knowledge of infringement relates to liability,
    2. introducing additional obligations, including evolving the “notice and notice” regime to a “notice and action” regime, and introducing mechanisms to deal with repeat infringers;
  2. introducing a new collective licensing regime geared towards further remuneration for use of copyright-protected content on certain platforms through a compulsory licensing scheme or an extended collective licensing scheme;
  3. fostering greater transparency surrounding rightsholders' remuneration and online uses of their content, including reporting requirements for rights management organizations; and
  4. clarifying or strengthening enforcement mechanisms, for example, by way of a statutory "website-blocking" and "de-indexing" regime.

The consultation paper is here, and the consultation is open until May 31, 2021.

For questions or assistance in responding to the consultation paper, contact Marks & Clerk. 

Note, a further consultation on copyright and artificial intelligence (AI) and the internet-of-things (IOT) is expected this summer. Stay tuned.

Next Story
  • How Kristina Milbourn is breaking the mould and making a difference
  • What is the patentability of Quantum Algorithms?
  • US court decision rules that use of “MetaBirkin” in relation to NFTs infringes trade mark rights in “Birkin” - Hermès v Mason Rothschild
  • New series of articles to focus on Cambridge-led innovations throughout 2023
  • UPC bite size video: What actions do patent holders need to take now?
More insights

Latest Insights

Article
- 30 March 2023

That’s a wrap! CJEU confirms position on protection for designs dictated by technical function

"Think about the common sense answer and then it's probably something else!" - that's what I always say to anyone I'm training when they ask me a question about a specific piece of IP law.
Read more
Image: Nike Air Max
Article
- 30 March 2023

Nike block MAX 1 for Verstappen

Max Verstappen's plans to launch a MAX 1 clothing range have run into a roadblock, as Nike successfully oppose his Benelux trade mark application on the basis of their rights in AIR MAX. 
Read more
Chemistry
Article
- 24 March 2023

Preliminary position on priority published

As we reported in early 2022, the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the EPO are considering two pending referrals (G1/22 and G2/22) regarding the question of entitlement to priority. A hearing has now been set for 26 May 2023, and the Enlarged Board have now issued a preliminary opinion setting out the points to be discussed.
Read more
Marks & Clerk logo (white)
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Notice
  • Cookies
  • Legal Notices
  • Press Enquiries
  • Lexology
  • Mondaq