• Our People
  • Global Presence
  • Regions
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Americas
  • Offices
    • Canada
      • Ottawa
      • Toronto
    • China
      • Beijing
      • Hong Kong
    • Luxembourg
    • Malaysia
    • Singapore
    • UK
      • Aberdeen
      • Birmingham
      • Cambridge
      • Edinburgh
      • Glasgow
      • London
      • Manchester
      • Oxford
  • Client liaison
    • Japan
    • Korea
  • Expertise
  • Services
    • Patents
    • Brands & Trade Marks
    • Designs
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Commercial IP & Contracts
    • Due Diligence
    • Freedom to Operate
    • EPO Patent Oppositions
    • European Patent Validations
    • Anti-counterfeiting
    • Open Source & Third Party Code
  • Sectors
    • Energy & Environment
    • Life Sciences
    • Agritech
    • Medical Technologies
    • Chemistry
    • Transport
    • Entertainment & Creative Industries
    • Food & Drink
    • Fashion & Retail
    • Universities & Research Bodies
    • Start-ups & Spin-outs
    • Digital Transformation
      • 3D Printing
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Blockchain
      • Data & Connectivity
      • Extended Reality
      • Industry 4.0
  • About Us
    • Working with us
    • Awards
    • Corporate & Social Responsibility
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Careers
  • Insights
    • Articles
    • News
    • Events
    • Resources
    • M&C Reacts
  • Contact Us
Marks & Clerk logo
Marks & Clerk logo
Contact Us
Language
English
Our People
Global Presence
Regions
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Americas
Offices
  • Canada
    • Ottawa
    • Toronto
  • China
    • Beijing
    • Hong Kong
  • Luxembourg
  • Malaysia
  • Singapore
  • UK
    • Aberdeen
    • Birmingham
    • Cambridge
    • Edinburgh
    • Glasgow
    • London
    • Manchester
    • Oxford
Client liaison
  • Japan
  • Korea
Expertise
Services
  • Patents
  • Brands & Trade Marks
  • Designs
  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
  • Commercial IP & Contracts
  • Due Diligence
  • Freedom to Operate
  • EPO Patent Oppositions
  • European Patent Validations
  • Anti-counterfeiting
  • Open Source & Third Party Code
Sectors
  • Energy & Environment
  • Life Sciences
  • Agritech
  • Medical Technologies
  • Chemistry
  • Transport
  • Entertainment & Creative Industries
  • Food & Drink
  • Fashion & Retail
  • Universities & Research Bodies
  • Start-ups & Spin-outs
  • Digital Transformation
    • 3D Printing
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Blockchain
    • Data & Connectivity
    • Extended Reality
    • Industry 4.0
About Us
  • Working with us
  • Awards
  • Corporate & Social Responsibility
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Careers
Insights
  • Articles
  • News
  • Events
  • Resources
  • M&C Reacts

Onerous new requirements slow down trade mark registration process in China

03 June 2014
Print
Share

The stricter trade mark filing requirements recently introduced by the China Trademarks Office (CTO) are creating headaches for trade mark owners and their attorneys. These onerous regulatory changes were introduced with the implementation of the new China Trade Mark Law and Regulations on 1 May 2014. The net result of the changes is unavoidable delay in instituting any action before the CTO. Despite widespread complaints, the CTO has so far refused to back down.

Additional documents with original signatures are now required when applying to register, assign, oppose, cancel or take any other action before the CTO. A copy of a signed power of attorney is no longer sufficient.  For the time-being, it is necessary to produce the following documents at the time of filing:  

  • An original Power of Attorney signed by an authorised representative of the applicant; 
  • A Chinese version of the Application Form signed by the same signatory. As the document is in Chinese, it may cause difficulties for non-Chinese speakers/readers;
  • A photocopy of the applicant’s Certificate of Incorporation, or Certificate of Good Standing, bearing the same original signature.

At present, there is some confusion with some trade mark agents interpreting the requirements differently. So far, applications filed under the new laws have not undergone examination for formal requirements, so it remains unknown what the CTO might allow.

For oppositions, the new requirements effectively shorten the opposition period for foreign opponents by about seven days to take account of time spent completing the original forms and their dispatch to China for filing. Original forms must be tendered when filing opposition; they cannot be tendered within the three-month period allowed for filing supplementary evidence.  

To expedite the filing process before the CTO, it is recommended that clients authorise Marks & Clerk Beijing to sign standard form documents on their behalf. We will provide a general power of attorney for this purpose on request.

The Trademarks Appeals Board (TAB) has adopted less stringent requirements. While it does now require a signed Power of Attorney with the original signature, a copy will be accepted at the time of filing so long as the original signed document is submitted within three months. A simple photocopy of the applicant’s Certificate of Incorporation without any signature must also be submitted.

Next Story
  • “All Change! All Change!” For WIPO Standard ST. 26
  • Overcoming hurdles when it comes to marketing activity for the Birmingham Commonwealth Games
  • Post-Brexit UK (and EU) AFA recordal process
  • MERCURY sues its former franchisee for Trade Mark Infringement
  • China: Filing Bad-Faith Trade Mark Applications Alone May Constitute Unfair competition
More insights

Latest Insights

What makes a good IP solicitor?
Article
- 15 August 2022

What makes a good intellectual property solicitor?

A vital value of most UT Companies are their IP in terms of patents, trademarks etc. Once registered and secured, the companies work every day to monetise that investment in a global market. Sometimes the IP comes under attack from competitors or other companies, and an international IP professional is needed to assist them. Those are some of the issues that a professional Intellectual Property Solicitors work with. But how do they work, and what is the difference between a Property Solicitors and a Patent Attorney?
Read more
Article
- 12 August 2022

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Agritech space

The European Patent Office (EPO) has seen a remarkable increase in the number of AI patent filings in the Agritech sector in recent years. In this article we highlight the growth from the year 2000 until 2019.
Read more
Photo: Gavel and Justice Scale
Article
- 11 August 2022

Cook v Boston – practicalities relating to the Shorter Trial Scheme and costs budgeting

The Shorter Trial Scheme (STS) was set up with the purpose of providing parties with an avenue to achieve earlier, shorter trials for reasonably sized litigation at a proportionate cost. The judgment in proceedings between Cook and Boston contains a few practical points on the STS and other case management issues.
Read more
Marks & Clerk logo (white)
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Notice
  • Cookies
  • Legal Notices
  • Lexology
  • Mondaq