• Our People
  • Global Presence
  • Regions
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Americas
  • Offices
    • Canada
      • Ottawa
      • Toronto
    • China
      • Beijing
      • Hong Kong
    • Luxembourg
    • Malaysia
    • Singapore
    • UK
      • Aberdeen
      • Birmingham
      • Cambridge
      • Edinburgh
      • Glasgow
      • London
      • Manchester
      • Oxford
  • Client liaison
    • Japan
    • Korea
  • Expertise
  • Services
    • Patents
    • Brands & Trade Marks
    • Designs
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Commercial IP & Contracts
    • Due Diligence
    • Freedom to Operate
    • EPO Patent Oppositions
    • European Patent Validations
    • Anti-counterfeiting
    • Open Source & Third Party Code
  • Sectors
    • Energy & Environment
    • Life Sciences
    • Agritech
    • Medical Technologies
    • Chemistry
    • Transport
    • Entertainment & Creative Industries
    • Food & Drink
    • Fashion & Retail
    • Universities & Research Bodies
    • Start-ups & Spin-outs
    • Digital Transformation
      • 3D Printing
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Blockchain
      • Data & Connectivity
      • Extended Reality
      • Industry 4.0
  • About Us
    • Working with us
    • Awards
    • Corporate & Social Responsibility
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Careers
  • Insights
    • Articles
    • News
    • Events
    • Resources
    • M&C Reacts
  • Contact Us
Marks & Clerk logo
Marks & Clerk logo
Contact Us
Language
English
Our People
Global Presence
Regions
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Americas
Offices
  • Canada
    • Ottawa
    • Toronto
  • China
    • Beijing
    • Hong Kong
  • Luxembourg
  • Malaysia
  • Singapore
  • UK
    • Aberdeen
    • Birmingham
    • Cambridge
    • Edinburgh
    • Glasgow
    • London
    • Manchester
    • Oxford
Client liaison
  • Japan
  • Korea
Expertise
Services
  • Patents
  • Brands & Trade Marks
  • Designs
  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
  • Commercial IP & Contracts
  • Due Diligence
  • Freedom to Operate
  • EPO Patent Oppositions
  • European Patent Validations
  • Anti-counterfeiting
  • Open Source & Third Party Code
Sectors
  • Energy & Environment
  • Life Sciences
  • Agritech
  • Medical Technologies
  • Chemistry
  • Transport
  • Entertainment & Creative Industries
  • Food & Drink
  • Fashion & Retail
  • Universities & Research Bodies
  • Start-ups & Spin-outs
  • Digital Transformation
    • 3D Printing
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Blockchain
    • Data & Connectivity
    • Extended Reality
    • Industry 4.0
About Us
  • Working with us
  • Awards
  • Corporate & Social Responsibility
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Careers
Insights
  • Articles
  • News
  • Events
  • Resources
  • M&C Reacts

European Union IP Office Covid-19 Extension

29 April 2020
Erik Rõuk
Print
Share

Following its initial announcement on 16th March 2020 extending all time limits until 1 May 2020, the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), have announced today, 29th April 2020, that all time limits expiring between 1 May 2020 and 17 May 2020 will be extended until 18 May 2020.

As previously, the extension will cover all procedural deadlines, irrespective of whether they have been set by the EUIPO or are stipulated directly in the Regulations, and the effect of the extension is automatic.

In accordance with the explanatory note published here, the term “all time limits” covers:

  • time limits set by the Office in any proceeding before the EUIPO, including the EUIPO Boards of Appeal; and
  • time limits imposed directly by the EU Trade Marks Regulations and Community Designs Regulations, including those originating from the Paris Convention or other International Treaties.

However the extension does not extend to proceedings before other authorities, such as the deadline for bringing an action before the General Court against decisions of the Boards of Appeal.

It is notable that the Office will continue to function in respect of any actions or procedural obligations that parties to proceedings before the EUIPO choose to discharge prior to the extended time limit. This means that, for example, that where the extended time limit concerns the submission of the last round of observations in an Opposition, Cancellation or RCD Invalidity action, and observations are submitted by the party concerned, the Office will close the adversarial stage of the proceedings, inform the parties accordingly and rule on the case on the basis of the evidence before it.

Similarly, if a response is filed against an absolute grounds objection, the Office will proceed to re-assess the eligibility for registration of the application before it.

We would recommend that we work to the original deadlines wherever possible, in order to avoid any potential backlog in cases following expiry of the extension, unless there is any commercial or strategic benefit in utilising the extension. In particular, the extension may provide more time in which to assemble evidence of use of a trade mark, or to conclude settlement negotiations with a third party.

The offices for Marks & Clerk have transitioned to working from home and we are able to deliver our full range of services to our clients. Please contact your local office or attorney directly, should you wish to arrange for a telephone or video conference regarding your IP rights.

Next Story
  • What makes a good intellectual property solicitor?
  • Patenting DLT innovations in Europe
  • Windtech International: Will European IP be the key for overseas countries in meeting their Net Zero targets?
  • Opportunities over next decade for local suppliers in wind farm supply chain
  • “All Change! All Change!” For WIPO Standard ST. 26
More insights

Latest Insights

What makes a good IP solicitor?
Article
- 15 August 2022

What makes a good intellectual property solicitor?

A vital value of most UT Companies are their IP in terms of patents, trademarks etc. Once registered and secured, the companies work every day to monetise that investment in a global market. Sometimes the IP comes under attack from competitors or other companies, and an international IP professional is needed to assist them. Those are some of the issues that a professional Intellectual Property Solicitors work with. But how do they work, and what is the difference between a Property Solicitors and a Patent Attorney?
Read more
Article
- 12 August 2022

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Agritech space

The European Patent Office (EPO) has seen a remarkable increase in the number of AI patent filings in the Agritech sector in recent years. In this article we highlight the growth from the year 2000 until 2019.
Read more
Photo: Gavel and Justice Scale
Article
- 11 August 2022

Cook v Boston – practicalities relating to the Shorter Trial Scheme and costs budgeting

The Shorter Trial Scheme (STS) was set up with the purpose of providing parties with an avenue to achieve earlier, shorter trials for reasonably sized litigation at a proportionate cost. The judgment in proceedings between Cook and Boston contains a few practical points on the STS and other case management issues.
Read more
Marks & Clerk logo (white)
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Notice
  • Cookies
  • Legal Notices
  • Lexology
  • Mondaq