• Our People
  • Global Presence
  • Regions
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Americas
  • Offices
    • Canada
      • Ottawa
      • Toronto
    • China
      • Beijing
      • Hong Kong
    • Luxembourg
    • Malaysia
    • Singapore
    • UK
      • Aberdeen
      • Birmingham
      • Cambridge
      • Edinburgh
      • Glasgow
      • London
      • Manchester
      • Oxford
  • Client liaison
    • Japan
    • Korea
  • Expertise
  • Services
    • Patents
    • Brands & Trade Marks
    • Designs
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Commercial IP & Contracts
    • Due Diligence
    • Freedom to Operate
    • EPO Patent Oppositions
    • European Patent Validations
    • Anti-counterfeiting
    • Open Source & Third Party Code
  • Sectors
    • Digital Transformation
      • 3D Printing
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Blockchain
      • Data & Connectivity
      • Extended Reality
      • Industry 4.0
    • Energy & Environment
    • Life Sciences
    • Agritech
    • Medical Technologies
    • Chemistry
    • Transport
    • Entertainment & Creative Industries
    • Food & Drink
    • Fashion & Retail
    • Universities & Research Bodies
    • Start-ups & Spin-outs
      • Creating value for start-ups
      • The IP driven start-up
    • Financial Services
  • About Us
    • Working with us
    • Awards
    • Corporate & Social Responsibility
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Careers
  • Insights
    • Articles
    • News
    • Events
    • Resources
    • Unified Patent Court hub
    • Beyond Brexit: European trade mark hub
    • M&C Reacts
  • Contact Us
Marks & Clerk logo
Marks & Clerk logo
Contact Us
Language
English Français 中文(简体)
Our People
Global Presence
Regions
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Americas
Offices
  • Canada
    • Ottawa
    • Toronto
  • China
    • Beijing
    • Hong Kong
  • Luxembourg
  • Malaysia
  • Singapore
  • UK
    • Aberdeen
    • Birmingham
    • Cambridge
    • Edinburgh
    • Glasgow
    • London
    • Manchester
    • Oxford
Client liaison
  • Japan
  • Korea
Expertise
Services
  • Patents
  • Brands & Trade Marks
  • Designs
  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
  • Commercial IP & Contracts
  • Due Diligence
  • Freedom to Operate
  • EPO Patent Oppositions
  • European Patent Validations
  • Anti-counterfeiting
  • Open Source & Third Party Code
Sectors
  • Digital Transformation
    • 3D Printing
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Blockchain
    • Data & Connectivity
    • Extended Reality
    • Industry 4.0
  • Energy & Environment
  • Life Sciences
  • Agritech
  • Medical Technologies
  • Chemistry
  • Transport
  • Entertainment & Creative Industries
  • Food & Drink
  • Fashion & Retail
  • Universities & Research Bodies
  • Start-ups & Spin-outs
    • Creating value for start-ups
    • The IP driven start-up
  • Financial Services
About Us
  • Working with us
  • Awards
  • Corporate & Social Responsibility
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Careers
Insights
  • Articles
  • News
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Unified Patent Court hub
  • Beyond Brexit: European trade mark hub
  • M&C Reacts

China focuses on accelerating patent and trade mark examinations during 14th Five-Year Plan

Photo of Chinese flag in front of office buildings
15 February 2022
Zephyr Su Xuefang Huang
Print
Share

Following promulgation of the 14th Five-Year Plan for IP Protection by the Chinese State Council in October 2021, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) recently released specific work plans to implement the aforementioned 14th Five-Year Plan for patent and trade mark examinations. The CNIPA plan states in particular the focus on transition from quantity to quality in intellectual properties, and thus the need to both accelerate patent and trade mark examinations, and to improve quality of applications.

On the patent side, the CNIPA provided some predictive indicators in 2025 regarding time durations for the examinations as follows:

Items Factual Values in 2020 Predicted Values in 2025
Time Required for Examination of Invention Patent Applications Since Examination Started 20 months 15 months
Time Required for Decisions in Invalidation Proceedings Since Case Initialization 6 months 6 months
User Satisfaction Index of Patent Examination Quality 85.4 85 or above
Accuracy of Invention Patent Examination 92.2% 95%

In comparison to the predicted time required for patent examination above, the average examination duration for standard cases at the EPO was 23.2 months at the end of Q1 2021 (source: EPO Quality Report 2020). On the USPTO side, the agency is now issuing final decisions — either allowing a patent or issuing a final rejection — on average within 23.3 months (source: USPTO year in review). As such, it is expected that during China’s new five-year plan, search and examination results from the CNIPA could provide applicants filing worldwide patent applications an early indication of their chance of success, and may serve as a basis for various patent prosecution highway schemes.

Other important targets mentioned in the plan include:

  1. Improving examination standards on new technologies like big data, artificial intelligence and genetic technology
  2. Setting different examination guidelines according to technology areas
  3. Completely removing patent subsidies at various governmental levels
  4. Conducting dynamic patent quality inspection and cleaning abnormal patent applications.

On the trade mark side, CNIPA's predictive indicators in terms of examination for 2025 compared to those for 2020 are as follows:

Items Factual Values in 2020 Predicted Values in 2025
Time Required for Examination of General TM Registration Requests 8 months 7 months
Time Required for Examination of TM Assignment 2 months 1 month
Time Required for Examination of TM Amendment or Renewal 1 month 15 days
Time Required for Examination of TM Opposition 14 months 10 months
Time Required for Examination of TM Review of Refusal 6 months 5.5 months
Time Required for Examination of TM Invalidation Petition 10 months 10 months
Quality pass rate of substantive examination of TM registration 95% 97%


As a matter of fact, the examination duration for most types of trade mark cases in China is already not long compared to many other jurisdictions. In practice, on the contrary, many applicants would like to see the CNIPA slow down its processing of some cases, in particular, the review requests of trade mark refusals, and to await the outcome of ancillary actions filed by the applicants against the cited earlier marks (such as non-use cancellation actions, oppositions and invalidation petitions). CNIPA's current practice is generally not to await the outcome of any ancillary actions, which has resulted, in part, in the extremely low success rate of trade mark review of refusal cases in China (only about 30%) and in a large number of repeatedly filed applications for trade mark registration.

Other important goals mentioned in the plan with respect to trade mark examination include, but are not limited to:

  1. Broadening the channels for raising questions about the quality of trade mark examination and expediting the processing of reports or complaints
  2. Strengthening the coordination and alignment of the examination of trade mark applications with other procedures, such as oppositions, adjudication cases (e.g., review of refusals, invalidation petitions, etc.)
  3. Establishing a fast approval mechanism for collective trade marks and certification trade marks
  4. Curbing malicious trade mark applications and issue statistical reports in this respect every quarter.

Conclusion

Most of these targets have already been proposed, and are in line with China’s plans to develop the country into the world's technology leader in the 21st Century. The Chinese government should develop more concrete implementation measures to achieve these goals. One initiative already in place is the issuance by the CNIPA on 27 January 2022 of the "Regulations on Credit Management of Intellectual Property", which classifies six types of acts, such as irregular patent applications not aimed at protecting innovation and malicious trade mark applications, as acts of breach of credibility, and the parties involved will be listed and punished for serious violations.

Next Story
  • Preliminary position on priority published
  • International patent insights on quantum computing
  • InterDigital v Lenovo: The latest FRAND judgment
  • Cambridge: City of Innovation - The 'beer summit' that generated a genomic revolution
  • IP protection in collaborations: "Just Do It"
More insights

Latest Insights

Chemistry
Article
- 24 March 2023

Preliminary position on priority published

As we reported in early 2022, the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the EPO are considering two pending referrals (G1/22 and G2/22) regarding the question of entitlement to priority. A hearing has now been set for 26 May 2023, and the Enlarged Board have now issued a preliminary opinion setting out the points to be discussed.
Read more
Quantum computing
Article
- 22 March 2023

International patent insights on quantum computing

The latest patent insight report from the European Patent Office (EPO) looks at the trends in patent filings for quantum computing, and has uncovered some interesting findings.
Read more
Article
- 22 March 2023

InterDigital v Lenovo: The latest FRAND judgment

On 16 March 2023, Mr Justice Mellor handed down the latest FRAND judgment: InterDigital v Lenovo. The case concerned a dispute between InterDigital and Lenovo as to the terms on which Lenovo should take a licence to InterDigital’s portfolio of patents which had been declared essential to the European Telecommunications Standard Institute (ETSI) Standards.
Read more
Marks & Clerk logo (white)
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Notice
  • Cookies
  • Legal Notices
  • Press Enquiries
  • Lexology
  • Mondaq