• Our People
  • Global Presence
  • Regions
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Americas
  • Offices
    • Canada
      • Ottawa
      • Toronto
    • China
      • Beijing
      • Hong Kong
    • Luxembourg
    • Malaysia
    • Singapore
    • UK
      • Aberdeen
      • Birmingham
      • Cambridge
      • Edinburgh
      • Glasgow
      • London
      • Manchester
      • Oxford
  • Client liaison
    • Japan
    • Korea
  • Expertise
  • Services
    • Patents
    • Brands & Trade Marks
    • Designs
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Commercial IP & Contracts
    • Due Diligence
    • Freedom to Operate
    • EPO Patent Oppositions
    • European Patent Validations
    • Anti-counterfeiting
    • Open Source & Third Party Code
  • Sectors
    • Energy & Environment
    • Life Sciences
    • Agritech
    • Medical Technologies
    • Chemistry
    • Transport
    • Entertainment & Creative Industries
    • Food & Drink
    • Fashion & Retail
    • Universities & Research Bodies
    • Start-ups & Spin-outs
    • Digital Transformation
      • 3D Printing
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Blockchain
      • Data & Connectivity
      • Extended Reality
      • Industry 4.0
  • About Us
    • Working with us
    • Awards
    • Corporate & Social Responsibility
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Careers
  • Insights
    • Articles
    • News
    • Events
    • Resources
    • M&C Reacts
  • Contact Us
Marks & Clerk logo
Marks & Clerk logo
Contact Us
Language
English Français 中文(简体)
Our People
Global Presence
Regions
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Americas
Offices
  • Canada
    • Ottawa
    • Toronto
  • China
    • Beijing
    • Hong Kong
  • Luxembourg
  • Malaysia
  • Singapore
  • UK
    • Aberdeen
    • Birmingham
    • Cambridge
    • Edinburgh
    • Glasgow
    • London
    • Manchester
    • Oxford
Client liaison
  • Japan
  • Korea
Expertise
Services
  • Patents
  • Brands & Trade Marks
  • Designs
  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
  • Commercial IP & Contracts
  • Due Diligence
  • Freedom to Operate
  • EPO Patent Oppositions
  • European Patent Validations
  • Anti-counterfeiting
  • Open Source & Third Party Code
Sectors
  • Energy & Environment
  • Life Sciences
  • Agritech
  • Medical Technologies
  • Chemistry
  • Transport
  • Entertainment & Creative Industries
  • Food & Drink
  • Fashion & Retail
  • Universities & Research Bodies
  • Start-ups & Spin-outs
  • Digital Transformation
    • 3D Printing
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Blockchain
    • Data & Connectivity
    • Extended Reality
    • Industry 4.0
About Us
  • Working with us
  • Awards
  • Corporate & Social Responsibility
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Careers
Insights
  • Articles
  • News
  • Events
  • Resources
  • M&C Reacts

China focuses on accelerating patent and trade mark examinations during 14th Five-Year Plan

Photo of Chinese flag in front of office buildings
15 February 2022
Zephyr Su Xuefang Huang
Print
Share

Following promulgation of the 14th Five-Year Plan for IP Protection by the Chinese State Council in October 2021, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) recently released specific work plans to implement the aforementioned 14th Five-Year Plan for patent and trade mark examinations. The CNIPA plan states in particular the focus on transition from quantity to quality in intellectual properties, and thus the need to both accelerate patent and trade mark examinations, and to improve quality of applications.

On the patent side, the CNIPA provided some predictive indicators in 2025 regarding time durations for the examinations as follows:

Items Factual Values in 2020 Predicted Values in 2025
Time Required for Examination of Invention Patent Applications Since Examination Started 20 months 15 months
Time Required for Decisions in Invalidation Proceedings Since Case Initialization 6 months 6 months
User Satisfaction Index of Patent Examination Quality 85.4 85 or above
Accuracy of Invention Patent Examination 92.2% 95%

In comparison to the predicted time required for patent examination above, the average examination duration for standard cases at the EPO was 23.2 months at the end of Q1 2021 (source: EPO Quality Report 2020). On the USPTO side, the agency is now issuing final decisions — either allowing a patent or issuing a final rejection — on average within 23.3 months (source: USPTO year in review). As such, it is expected that during China’s new five-year plan, search and examination results from the CNIPA could provide applicants filing worldwide patent applications an early indication of their chance of success, and may serve as a basis for various patent prosecution highway schemes.

Other important targets mentioned in the plan include:

  1. Improving examination standards on new technologies like big data, artificial intelligence and genetic technology
  2. Setting different examination guidelines according to technology areas
  3. Completely removing patent subsidies at various governmental levels
  4. Conducting dynamic patent quality inspection and cleaning abnormal patent applications.

On the trade mark side, CNIPA's predictive indicators in terms of examination for 2025 compared to those for 2020 are as follows:

Items Factual Values in 2020 Predicted Values in 2025
Time Required for Examination of General TM Registration Requests 8 months 7 months
Time Required for Examination of TM Assignment 2 months 1 month
Time Required for Examination of TM Amendment or Renewal 1 month 15 days
Time Required for Examination of TM Opposition 14 months 10 months
Time Required for Examination of TM Review of Refusal 6 months 5.5 months
Time Required for Examination of TM Invalidation Petition 10 months 10 months
Quality pass rate of substantive examination of TM registration 95% 97%


As a matter of fact, the examination duration for most types of trade mark cases in China is already not long compared to many other jurisdictions. In practice, on the contrary, many applicants would like to see the CNIPA slow down its processing of some cases, in particular, the review requests of trade mark refusals, and to await the outcome of ancillary actions filed by the applicants against the cited earlier marks (such as non-use cancellation actions, oppositions and invalidation petitions). CNIPA's current practice is generally not to await the outcome of any ancillary actions, which has resulted, in part, in the extremely low success rate of trade mark review of refusal cases in China (only about 30%) and in a large number of repeatedly filed applications for trade mark registration.

Other important goals mentioned in the plan with respect to trade mark examination include, but are not limited to:

  1. Broadening the channels for raising questions about the quality of trade mark examination and expediting the processing of reports or complaints
  2. Strengthening the coordination and alignment of the examination of trade mark applications with other procedures, such as oppositions, adjudication cases (e.g., review of refusals, invalidation petitions, etc.)
  3. Establishing a fast approval mechanism for collective trade marks and certification trade marks
  4. Curbing malicious trade mark applications and issue statistical reports in this respect every quarter.

Conclusion

Most of these targets have already been proposed, and are in line with China’s plans to develop the country into the world's technology leader in the 21st Century. The Chinese government should develop more concrete implementation measures to achieve these goals. One initiative already in place is the issuance by the CNIPA on 27 January 2022 of the "Regulations on Credit Management of Intellectual Property", which classifies six types of acts, such as irregular patent applications not aimed at protecting innovation and malicious trade mark applications, as acts of breach of credibility, and the parties involved will be listed and punished for serious violations.

Next Story
  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Agritech space
  • Cook v Boston – practicalities relating to the Shorter Trial Scheme and costs budgeting
  • Patenting DLT innovations in Europe
  • Applications of DLTs
  • Windtech International: Will European IP be the key for overseas countries in meeting their Net Zero targets?
More insights

Latest Insights

What makes a good IP solicitor?
Article
- 15 August 2022

What makes a good intellectual property solicitor?

A vital value of most UT Companies are their IP in terms of patents, trademarks etc. Once registered and secured, the companies work every day to monetise that investment in a global market. Sometimes the IP comes under attack from competitors or other companies, and an international IP professional is needed to assist them. Those are some of the issues that a professional Intellectual Property Solicitors work with. But how do they work, and what is the difference between a Property Solicitors and a Patent Attorney?
Read more
Article
- 12 August 2022

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Agritech space

The European Patent Office (EPO) has seen a remarkable increase in the number of AI patent filings in the Agritech sector in recent years. In this article we highlight the growth from the year 2000 until 2019.
Read more
Photo: Gavel and Justice Scale
Article
- 11 August 2022

Cook v Boston – practicalities relating to the Shorter Trial Scheme and costs budgeting

The Shorter Trial Scheme (STS) was set up with the purpose of providing parties with an avenue to achieve earlier, shorter trials for reasonably sized litigation at a proportionate cost. The judgment in proceedings between Cook and Boston contains a few practical points on the STS and other case management issues.
Read more
Marks & Clerk logo (white)
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Notice
  • Cookies
  • Legal Notices
  • Lexology
  • Mondaq