• Our People
  • Global Presence
  • Regions
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Americas
  • Offices
    • Canada
      • Ottawa
      • Toronto
    • China
      • Beijing
      • Hong Kong
    • Luxembourg
    • Malaysia
    • Singapore
    • UK
      • Aberdeen
      • Birmingham
      • Cambridge
      • Edinburgh
      • Glasgow
      • London
      • Manchester
      • Oxford
  • Client liaison
    • Japan
    • Korea
  • Expertise
  • Services
    • Patents
    • Brands & Trade Marks
    • Designs
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Commercial IP & Contracts
    • Due Diligence
    • Freedom to Operate
    • EPO Patent Oppositions
    • European Patent Validations
    • Anti-counterfeiting
    • Open Source & Third Party Code
  • Sectors
    • Digital Transformation
      • 3D Printing
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Blockchain
      • Data & Connectivity
      • Extended Reality
      • Industry 4.0
    • Energy & Environment
    • Life Sciences
    • Agritech
    • Medical Technologies
    • Chemistry
    • Transport
    • Entertainment & Creative Industries
    • Food & Drink
    • Fashion & Retail
    • Universities & Research Bodies
    • Start-ups & Spin-outs
      • Creating value for start-ups
      • The IP driven start-up
    • Financial Services
  • About Us
    • Working with us
    • Awards
    • Corporate & Social Responsibility
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Careers
  • Insights
    • Articles
    • News
    • Events
    • Resources
    • Unified Patent Court hub
    • Beyond Brexit: European trade mark hub
    • M&C Reacts
  • Contact Us
Marks & Clerk logo
Marks & Clerk logo
Contact Us
Language
English
Our People
Global Presence
Regions
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Americas
Offices
  • Canada
    • Ottawa
    • Toronto
  • China
    • Beijing
    • Hong Kong
  • Luxembourg
  • Malaysia
  • Singapore
  • UK
    • Aberdeen
    • Birmingham
    • Cambridge
    • Edinburgh
    • Glasgow
    • London
    • Manchester
    • Oxford
Client liaison
  • Japan
  • Korea
Expertise
Services
  • Patents
  • Brands & Trade Marks
  • Designs
  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
  • Commercial IP & Contracts
  • Due Diligence
  • Freedom to Operate
  • EPO Patent Oppositions
  • European Patent Validations
  • Anti-counterfeiting
  • Open Source & Third Party Code
Sectors
  • Digital Transformation
    • 3D Printing
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Blockchain
    • Data & Connectivity
    • Extended Reality
    • Industry 4.0
  • Energy & Environment
  • Life Sciences
  • Agritech
  • Medical Technologies
  • Chemistry
  • Transport
  • Entertainment & Creative Industries
  • Food & Drink
  • Fashion & Retail
  • Universities & Research Bodies
  • Start-ups & Spin-outs
    • Creating value for start-ups
    • The IP driven start-up
  • Financial Services
About Us
  • Working with us
  • Awards
  • Corporate & Social Responsibility
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Careers
Insights
  • Articles
  • News
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Unified Patent Court hub
  • Beyond Brexit: European trade mark hub
  • M&C Reacts

No slice of the (caterpillar) cake for Aldi, says M&S. But does the claim have legs?

16 April 2021
Print
Share

The caterpillar cake has long been an iconic focal point of children’s parties and office celebrations across the UK – a British institution in the form of a chocolate sponge cake, covered in more chocolate and decorated to resemble their wiggling namesakes. But can one supermarket prevent their competitors from making copy-caterpillars? Marks & Spencer (M&S) certainly thinks so, after bringing infringement proceedings against Aldi and its “Cuthbert the Caterpillar” cake.

In 1990 the first caterpillar cake was sold by M&S. The supermarket chain claims to have manufactured 15 million caterpillar cakes to date under “Colin the Caterpillar” and “Connie the Caterpillar”, and protected the brands as UK trade marks in 2008 and 2016 respectively. The UK’s “big four” supermarkets have been selling Colin and Connie alternatives for some time under the names “Curly the Caterpillar”, “Wiggles the Caterpillar”, “Clyde the Caterpillar” and “Morris the Caterpillar” (no prizes for guessing which one is sold by Morrison’s).

This week M&S denied Aldi’s slice of the cake and lodged infringement proceedings at the High Court against its “Cuthbert the Caterpillar”. M&S claims that the Cuthbert cake ‘rides on the coat-tails’ of Colin’s reputation and infringes their trade marks by taking unfair advantage. One remedy sought is that Aldi stops using the mark.

One of the arguments M&S may make is that consumers could be confused as to the origin of Aldi’s “Cuthbert Caterpillar”, and wrongly assume that the cake originates from M&S. This argument may leave M&S’ “Colin the Caterpillar” without a leg to stand on. The marketplace is crawling with cakes that use the word “caterpillar” to describe to consumers the type of cake that is for sale. This is a problem for M&S because elements within signs that are descriptive are incapable of being perceived as a trade marks by consumers. The public policy rule that underpins this is that certain words need to be kept free for all traders to use in the marketplace.

Where a sign contains a descriptive element, such as “caterpillar”, consumers will look to other brand elements to differentiate the origin of the cake that they are buying, such as “Colin”, “Connie”, “Wiggles”, “Clyde”, “Morris” or “Cuthbert”. The High Court may put more emphasis on comparing the beginnings of the respective signs (“Colin” vs. “Cuthbert”) and could conclude that, taking into account the differences between the prefixes and the dominant and distinctive elements, there is no risk of consumer confusion. The existence of the other caterpillar cakes on the market could also slice through Marks & Spencer’s case, as the court could find that the average consumer in the UK is used to seeing similar cakes from various traders, without necessarily making the association with M&S.

In addition to trade mark infringement, M&S may also try to claim that Aldi’s Cuthbert amounts to ‘passing off’ – a UK common law offence which can protect any goodwill associated with unregistered rights, including the ‘get up’ or appearance of a product. M&S would need to prove that Aldi’s cake has damaged, or has the potential to damage, their goodwill in Colin the Caterpillar – for example, through loss of sales if customers opt for Aldi’s cheaper alternative.

This is not the first time a brand owner has taken Aldi to court over accusations of copying. The makers of Moroccanoil claimed Aldi’s Miracle Oil hair product – which it said was sold in misleadingly similar packaging to its own hair products – amounted to passing off. Their claim was unsuccessful as the court found there was no misrepresentation made by Aldi – the customer would know that the £4 product they were buying in Aldi was not the genuine £30 high-end salon product. It will be interesting to see if the court reaches a different decision in the current case where the products are sold at a much closer price point (Aldi’s Cuthbert sells for £5 compared to £7 for Colin).

On social media at least, Aldi appears to have responded to the caterpillar cake case in a typically tongue-in-cheek fashion. After news of the case went viral, Aldi UK tweeted ‘This is not just any court case, this is… #FreeCuthbert’ – a not-so-subtle nod to M&S’ famous advertising slogan.

Next Story
  • Cambridge: City of Innovation - 70 Years of the Cambridge DNA Revolution
  • Marks & Spencer lights up Aldi design infringement
  • Change to UKIPO practice where no UK representative has been appointed
  • Key differences between the EU and UK TM opposition systems
  • How to coordinate action against identical EU and UK TM applications
More insights

Latest Insights

Black bike seat on an orange frame
Article
- 07 February 2023

To see, or not to see?

There is an interesting question to be answered – to what extent does a design detail need to be visible in order for it to be a part of the scope of protection of a registered design for a complex product
Read more
Beakers and historical buildings interlaced on a Cambridge backdrop
Article
- 07 February 2023

Cambridge: City of Innovation - 70 Years of the Cambridge DNA Revolution

Cambridge has laid claim to many historic scientific achievements in the 800 years since the foundation of its University. Amongst them, the the elucidation of the double helix structure of DNA, which took place 70 years ago.
Read more
two festive gin bottles glowing with gold pieces floating inside, sitting alongside two out of focus festive cocktails
Article
- 03 February 2023

Marks & Spencer lights up Aldi design infringement

Marks & Spencer has successfully enforced several UK registered designs against Aldi’s copycat products in a decision that should provide welcome reassurance for designers seeking to use registered designs to protect their products.
Read more
Marks & Clerk logo (white)
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Notice
  • Cookies
  • Legal Notices
  • Lexology
  • Mondaq