• Our People
  • Global Presence
  • Regions
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Americas
  • Offices
    • Canada
      • Ottawa
      • Toronto
    • China
      • Beijing
      • Hong Kong
    • Luxembourg
    • Malaysia
    • Singapore
    • UK
      • Aberdeen
      • Birmingham
      • Cambridge
      • Edinburgh
      • Glasgow
      • London
      • Manchester
      • Oxford
  • Client liaison
    • Japan
    • Korea
  • Expertise
  • Services
    • Patents
    • Brands & Trade Marks
    • Designs
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Commercial IP & Contracts
    • Due Diligence
    • Freedom to Operate
    • EPO Patent Oppositions
    • European Patent Validations
    • Anti-counterfeiting
    • Open Source & Third Party Code
  • Sectors
    • Digital Transformation
      • 3D Printing
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Blockchain
      • Data & Connectivity
      • Extended Reality
      • Industry 4.0
    • Energy & Environment
    • Life Sciences
    • Agritech
    • Medical Technologies
    • Chemistry
    • Transport
    • Entertainment & Creative Industries
    • Food & Drink
    • Fashion & Retail
    • Universities & Research Bodies
    • Start-ups & Spin-outs
      • Creating value for start-ups
      • The IP driven start-up
    • Financial Services
  • About Us
    • Working with us
    • Awards
    • Corporate & Social Responsibility
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Careers
  • Insights
    • Articles
    • News
    • Events
    • Resources
    • Unified Patent Court hub
    • Beyond Brexit: European trade mark hub
    • M&C Reacts
  • Contact Us
Marks & Clerk logo
Marks & Clerk logo
Contact Us
Language
English 中文(简体)
Our People
Global Presence
Regions
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Americas
Offices
  • Canada
    • Ottawa
    • Toronto
  • China
    • Beijing
    • Hong Kong
  • Luxembourg
  • Malaysia
  • Singapore
  • UK
    • Aberdeen
    • Birmingham
    • Cambridge
    • Edinburgh
    • Glasgow
    • London
    • Manchester
    • Oxford
Client liaison
  • Japan
  • Korea
Expertise
Services
  • Patents
  • Brands & Trade Marks
  • Designs
  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
  • Commercial IP & Contracts
  • Due Diligence
  • Freedom to Operate
  • EPO Patent Oppositions
  • European Patent Validations
  • Anti-counterfeiting
  • Open Source & Third Party Code
Sectors
  • Digital Transformation
    • 3D Printing
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Blockchain
    • Data & Connectivity
    • Extended Reality
    • Industry 4.0
  • Energy & Environment
  • Life Sciences
  • Agritech
  • Medical Technologies
  • Chemistry
  • Transport
  • Entertainment & Creative Industries
  • Food & Drink
  • Fashion & Retail
  • Universities & Research Bodies
  • Start-ups & Spin-outs
    • Creating value for start-ups
    • The IP driven start-up
  • Financial Services
About Us
  • Working with us
  • Awards
  • Corporate & Social Responsibility
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Careers
Insights
  • Articles
  • News
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Unified Patent Court hub
  • Beyond Brexit: European trade mark hub
  • M&C Reacts

CNIPA held trade mark incorporating Geographical Indication unregistrable

30 June 2021
Peggy Zhu
Print
Share

The Trademark Office of China National Intellectual Property Administration (“CNIPA”) recently held a Chinese company’s application for a trade mark that incorporates a Geographical Indication (“GI”) to be unregistrable on absolute grounds and also because of its similarity to an earlier registration of a third party.

Image from trade mark application: ISLAY in large letters, 遇见 艾雷 in smaller text below.

In July 2019, a Chinese company applied to register the trade mark for of a variety of liquors in class 33, including whisky. “ISLAY” is a protected GI, being the name of the southernmost island of the Inner Hebrides of Scotland. It is one of five whisky distilling localities and regions in Scotland. In 2010, the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of China conferred protection on “Scotch Whisky” as a GI. ISLAY is listed in the official announcement as a protected location. It is also stipulated in this announcement that a protected location shall not be used as an indication, or on packaging, advertisements or promotions unless the whisky is distilled or brewed at the protected location.

The Chinese version of the name “ISLAY” comprises two Chinese characters艾雷. This is the most frequently used transliteration of “ISLAY”. In the applied-for mark, the initial two characters 遇见 simply mean “meet”.

The practice of the CNIPA is to reject any application to register marks that incorporate a well-known foreign geographical name, let alone a protected GI, especially when the applicant or its goods do not originate from that region. However, contrary to usual procedure, this application inexplicably passed official examination and was published in December 2019.

Not surprisingly, the application was opposed and thereby prevented from registration.  Two entities, both from Scotland, filed oppositions within the statutory time limit. One opponent was The Scotch Whisky Association (“SWA”); the other was a Scottish whisky distiller with a valid China registration for the trade mark “ISLAY MIST”. Marks & Clerk Beijing represented the Scottish whisky distiller in this case.

In its decision, the CNIPA supported the SWA claim that ISLAY is a protected GI that is famous for Scotch Whisky and that the opposed mark would deceive and mislead consumers as to the place of origin, quality and flavor of the designated goods. At the same time, the CNIPA also supported the opposition filed by the Scottish whisky distiller based on a recognition of the similarity between the opposed mark and the distiller’s registered “ISLAY MIST” mark.

In principle, responsibility for detecting and rejecting applications that violate absolute grounds should properly lay with the authorities. However, in practice, due to technical limitations, this may not always happen and some applications may inadvertently slip through the net. While examination procedures and standards in China are always improving, this case illustrates the need for brand owners to continue to monitor their rights and to oppose in exceptional cases like this.

Next Story
  • Marks & Spencer lights up Aldi design infringement
  • Change to UKIPO practice where no UK representative has been appointed
  • Key differences between the EU and UK TM opposition systems
  • How to coordinate action against identical EU and UK TM applications
  • Meeting the UK trade mark challenge
More insights

Latest Insights

Black bike seat on an orange frame
Article
- 07 February 2023

To see, or not to see?

There is an interesting question to be answered – to what extent does a design detail need to be visible in order for it to be a part of the scope of protection of a registered design for a complex product
Read more
Beakers and historical buildings interlaced on a Cambridge backdrop
Article
- 07 February 2023

Cambridge: City of Innovation - 70 Years of the Cambridge DNA Revolution

Cambridge has laid claim to many historic scientific achievements in the 800 years since the foundation of its University. Amongst them, the the elucidation of the double helix structure of DNA, which took place 70 years ago.
Read more
two festive gin bottles glowing with gold pieces floating inside, sitting alongside two out of focus festive cocktails
Article
- 03 February 2023

Marks & Spencer lights up Aldi design infringement

Marks & Spencer has successfully enforced several UK registered designs against Aldi’s copycat products in a decision that should provide welcome reassurance for designers seeking to use registered designs to protect their products.
Read more
Marks & Clerk logo (white)
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Notice
  • Cookies
  • Legal Notices
  • Lexology
  • Mondaq