• Our People
  • Global Presence
  • Regions
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Americas
  • Offices
    • Canada
      • Ottawa
      • Toronto
    • China
      • Beijing
      • Hong Kong
    • Luxembourg
    • Malaysia
    • Singapore
    • UK
      • Aberdeen
      • Birmingham
      • Cambridge
      • Edinburgh
      • Glasgow
      • London
      • Manchester
      • Oxford
  • Client liaison
    • Japan
    • Korea
  • Expertise
  • Services
    • Patents
    • Brands & Trade Marks
    • Designs
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Commercial IP & Contracts
    • Due Diligence
    • Freedom to Operate
    • EPO Patent Oppositions
    • European Patent Validations
    • Anti-counterfeiting
    • Open Source & Third Party Code
  • Sectors
    • Energy & Environment
    • Life Sciences
    • Agritech
    • Medical Technologies
    • Chemistry
    • Transport
    • Entertainment & Creative Industries
    • Food & Drink
    • Fashion & Retail
    • Universities & Research Bodies
    • Start-ups & Spin-outs
    • Digital Transformation
      • 3D Printing
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Blockchain
      • Data & Connectivity
      • Extended Reality
      • Industry 4.0
  • About Us
    • Working with us
    • Awards
    • Corporate & Social Responsibility
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Careers
  • Insights
    • Articles
    • News
    • Events
    • Resources
    • M&C Reacts
  • Contact Us
Marks & Clerk logo
Marks & Clerk logo
Contact Us
Language
English
Our People
Global Presence
Regions
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Americas
Offices
  • Canada
    • Ottawa
    • Toronto
  • China
    • Beijing
    • Hong Kong
  • Luxembourg
  • Malaysia
  • Singapore
  • UK
    • Aberdeen
    • Birmingham
    • Cambridge
    • Edinburgh
    • Glasgow
    • London
    • Manchester
    • Oxford
Client liaison
  • Japan
  • Korea
Expertise
Services
  • Patents
  • Brands & Trade Marks
  • Designs
  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
  • Commercial IP & Contracts
  • Due Diligence
  • Freedom to Operate
  • EPO Patent Oppositions
  • European Patent Validations
  • Anti-counterfeiting
  • Open Source & Third Party Code
Sectors
  • Energy & Environment
  • Life Sciences
  • Agritech
  • Medical Technologies
  • Chemistry
  • Transport
  • Entertainment & Creative Industries
  • Food & Drink
  • Fashion & Retail
  • Universities & Research Bodies
  • Start-ups & Spin-outs
  • Digital Transformation
    • 3D Printing
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Blockchain
    • Data & Connectivity
    • Extended Reality
    • Industry 4.0
About Us
  • Working with us
  • Awards
  • Corporate & Social Responsibility
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Careers
Insights
  • Articles
  • News
  • Events
  • Resources
  • M&C Reacts
Photo: Trevor Crosse

Trevor Crosse

Partner

Europe
London

Get in contact

+44 20 7420 0250 tcrosse@marks-clerk.com
vCard

Trevor is an intellectual property lawyer who advises clients on the commercialisation and enforcement of their IP rights, with a particular focus on patent and licensing disputes in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical sectors. His primary expertise lies in biopharmaceutical patent and SPC litigation, in which he regularly advises clients in relation to complex technical disputes.

Trevor has advised clients on actions in the High Court, Court of Appeal and Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, as well as in relation to references to the Court of Justice of the European Union. His work routinely involves multi-jurisdictional disputes and he has significant experience co-ordinating global litigation strategies for his clients.

Trevor qualified as a solicitor in 2009 and joined Marks & Clerk Law in 2010. He became a partner of the firm in 2019.

Trevor has been recognised as a rising star by Managing Intellectual Property, IP Stars, 2018.

Example Cases

Eli Lilly v Genentech (Anti-IL17A/F antibodies)

Chugai Pharmaceutical Co v UCB Pharma (Antibody humanisation protocols)

Fujifilm Kyowa Kirin Biologics v AbbVie (Humira therapy for Crohn’s disease)

Fujifilm Kyowa Kirin Biologics v AbbVie (Humira dosing regimen)

Hospira UK v Genentech (Herceptin combination therapy)

Hospira UK v Genentech (Herceptin formulation)

Hospira UK v Genentech (Herceptin dosing regimen)

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals v Genentech (VEGF antagonists)

MedImmune v Novartis (Phage display)

Languages

  • English

Qualifications

Postgraduate Diploma in Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Oxford University (2012)

Qualified as a Solicitor in England & Wales (2009)

Legal Practice Course, College of Law, Birmingham (2006)

Graduate Diploma in Law, College of Law, Birmingham (2005)

BSc Microbiology with Immunology, University of Leeds (2003)

Search our people

Latest articles by Trevor Crosse

Article
- 12 October 2021

Mr Justice Meade highlights the importance of confidentiality when dealing with draft judgments

Mr Justice Meade recently handed down a short but important judgment dealing with issues of confidentiality which arose following circulation (but before hand-down) of a draft judgment.
This decision related to a suspected leak of the draft judgment from an earlier trial between the parties (Optis Cellular v Apple Retail [2021] EWHC 2564 (Pat), known as “Trial F”), handed down at the end of September as part of an ongoing SEP and FRAND dispute.
Read more
Article
- 08 September 2021

No Multiverse Here: A Single Counterfactual for All Claimants In Pregabalin Damages Inquiry

In this trial of preliminary issues, Zacaroli J held that when assessing the damages payable to multiple claimants under cross-undertakings given in respect of various interim injunctions and orders (and for unjustified threats of patent infringement), a single set of counterfactual assumptions should apply to all inquiry claimants, where those claimants operate in the same, largely finite, market. The decision is the latest in a long line of judgments concerning Pfizer’s pregabalin product, Lyrica®.
Read more
Article
- 03 September 2021

Court of Appeal upholds validity of pharmaceutical patent claims with functional limitations: FibroGen Inc v Akebia Therapeutics Inc [2021] EWCA Civ 1279

The UK Court of Appeal has reviewed the law on insufficiency and its application to claims with both structural and functional limitations. In doing so the court has explained how the concepts of plausibility and undue burden should be applied when assessing the sufficiency of claims of this type, in particular to the requirement that it must be possible to perform the invention across the breadth of the claim.
Read more
Marks & Clerk logo (white)
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Notice
  • Cookies
  • Legal Notices
  • Lexology
  • Mondaq