• Our People
  • Global Presence
  • Regions
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Americas
  • Offices
    • Canada
      • Ottawa
      • Toronto
    • China
      • Beijing
      • Hong Kong
    • Luxembourg
    • Malaysia
    • Singapore
    • UK
      • Aberdeen
      • Birmingham
      • Cambridge
      • Edinburgh
      • Glasgow
      • London
      • Manchester
      • Oxford
  • Client liaison
    • Japan
    • Korea
  • Expertise
  • Services
    • Patents
    • Brands & Trade Marks
    • Designs
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Commercial IP & Contracts
    • Due Diligence
    • Freedom to Operate
    • EPO Patent Oppositions
    • European Patent Validations
    • Anti-counterfeiting
    • Open Source & Third Party Code
  • Sectors
    • Energy & Environment
    • Life Sciences
    • Agritech
    • Medical Technologies
    • Chemistry
    • Transport
    • Entertainment & Creative Industries
    • Food & Drink
    • Fashion & Retail
    • Universities & Research Bodies
    • Start-ups & Spin-outs
    • Digital Transformation
      • 3D Printing
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Blockchain
      • Data & Connectivity
      • Extended Reality
      • Industry 4.0
  • About Us
    • Working with us
    • Awards
    • Corporate & Social Responsibility
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Careers
  • Insights
    • Articles
    • News
    • Events
    • Resources
    • M&C Reacts
  • Contact Us
Marks & Clerk logo
Marks & Clerk logo
Contact Us
Language
English
Our People
Global Presence
Regions
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Americas
Offices
  • Canada
    • Ottawa
    • Toronto
  • China
    • Beijing
    • Hong Kong
  • Luxembourg
  • Malaysia
  • Singapore
  • UK
    • Aberdeen
    • Birmingham
    • Cambridge
    • Edinburgh
    • Glasgow
    • London
    • Manchester
    • Oxford
Client liaison
  • Japan
  • Korea
Expertise
Services
  • Patents
  • Brands & Trade Marks
  • Designs
  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
  • Commercial IP & Contracts
  • Due Diligence
  • Freedom to Operate
  • EPO Patent Oppositions
  • European Patent Validations
  • Anti-counterfeiting
  • Open Source & Third Party Code
Sectors
  • Energy & Environment
  • Life Sciences
  • Agritech
  • Medical Technologies
  • Chemistry
  • Transport
  • Entertainment & Creative Industries
  • Food & Drink
  • Fashion & Retail
  • Universities & Research Bodies
  • Start-ups & Spin-outs
  • Digital Transformation
    • 3D Printing
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Blockchain
    • Data & Connectivity
    • Extended Reality
    • Industry 4.0
About Us
  • Working with us
  • Awards
  • Corporate & Social Responsibility
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Careers
Insights
  • Articles
  • News
  • Events
  • Resources
  • M&C Reacts

Too vague: Prince Harry and Meghan's trade mark application refused

19 June 2020
Print
Share

It is quite rare for a trade mark refusal to make the headlines of the national press. But when applicants are the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, it is perhaps no surprise that the rejection of their US trade mark application for ‘Archewell’ has garnered media attention.

The US application for ‘Archewell’ – the name for the Sussexes’ new charitable organisation after dropping their plans to name it ‘Sussex Royal’ – has received a non-final objection, on the grounds that the list of services covered by the application is too vague. In addition, the trade mark application form was also unsigned.

The US Examiner raised an objection to the term ‘providing a website featuring content relating to philanthropy, monetary giving, volunteer and career opportunities’ for being indefinite and over-broad. The Sussexes can overcome the objection by further specifying the nature of the content provided.

Such refusals are not uncommon. When a trade mark application is filed, the applicant must list all the goods and services they intend to protect under the mark. The application is then examined by the relevant trade marks registry of the territory in question.

In practice, the US Patents and Trademarks Office – the body responsible for examining and registering trade marks in the US – adopts a relatively stringent approach to the classification of goods and services, ensuring that the specifications covered by an application are precise and specific. As a result, applicants may be asked to provide further information about the goods or services they wish to protect, to ensure their application is limited to the particular areas of interest.

A trade mark attorney or intellectual property solicitor can assist you when preparing your trade mark application to reduce the chance of receiving a refusal or an opposition from a third party. If a refusal is received, as in the case of ‘Archewell’, then an attorney can advise on the best way to respond.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex also have pending trade mark applications for ‘Archewell’ in the European Union, Australia and Canada. In addition, the US application has been used as the basis for an International trade mark application, which currently designates China, India, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand and Russia. The applications cover a wide range of charitable and educational services, as well as merchandise such as clothing and books.

Next Story
  • What makes a good intellectual property solicitor?
  • Patenting DLT innovations in Europe
  • Windtech International: Will European IP be the key for overseas countries in meeting their Net Zero targets?
  • Opportunities over next decade for local suppliers in wind farm supply chain
  • “All Change! All Change!” For WIPO Standard ST. 26
More insights

Latest Insights

Article
- 19 August 2022

Net Zero – 10,000 days to go

As of this week, it is 10,000 days until the start of 2050, which is when the vast majority of the world is aiming to arrive at net zero. Much progress has taken place around the world and in this article we will explore the journey being undertaken on the road to net zero in critical materials and alternative fuels.
Read more
What makes a good IP solicitor?
Article
- 15 August 2022

What makes a good intellectual property solicitor?

A vital value of most UT Companies is their IP in terms of patents, trademarks etc. Sometimes the IP comes under attack from competitors or other companies, which is where an Intellectual Property Solicitor comes in. But how do they work, and what is the difference between a Property Solicitor and a Patent Attorney?
Read more
Article
- 12 August 2022

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Agritech space

The European Patent Office (EPO) has seen a remarkable increase in the number of AI patent filings in the Agritech sector in recent years. In this article we highlight the growth from the year 2000 until 2019.
Read more
Marks & Clerk logo (white)
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Notice
  • Cookies
  • Legal Notices
  • Lexology
  • Mondaq