• Our People
  • Global Presence
  • Regions
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Americas
  • Offices
    • Canada
      • Ottawa
      • Toronto
    • China
      • Beijing
      • Hong Kong
    • Luxembourg
    • Malaysia
    • Singapore
    • UK
      • Aberdeen
      • Birmingham
      • Cambridge
      • Edinburgh
      • Glasgow
      • London
      • Manchester
      • Oxford
  • Client liaison
    • Japan
    • Korea
  • Expertise
  • Services
    • Patents
    • Brands & Trade Marks
    • Designs
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Commercial IP & Contracts
    • Due Diligence
    • Freedom to Operate
    • EPO Patent Oppositions
    • European Patent Validations
    • Anti-counterfeiting
    • Open Source & Third Party Code
  • Sectors
    • Digital Transformation
      • 3D Printing
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Blockchain
      • Data & Connectivity
      • Extended Reality
      • Industry 4.0
    • Energy & Environment
    • Life Sciences
    • Agritech
    • Medical Technologies
    • Chemistry
    • Transport
    • Entertainment & Creative Industries
    • Food & Drink
    • Fashion & Retail
    • Universities & Research Bodies
    • Start-ups & Spin-outs
      • Creating value for start-ups
      • The IP driven start-up
    • Financial Services
  • About Us
    • Working with us
    • Awards
    • Corporate & Social Responsibility
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Careers
  • Insights
    • Articles
    • News
    • Events
    • Resources
    • Unified Patent Court hub
    • Beyond Brexit: European trade mark hub
    • M&C Reacts
  • Contact Us
Marks & Clerk logo
Marks & Clerk logo
Contact Us
Language
English
Our People
Global Presence
Regions
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Americas
Offices
  • Canada
    • Ottawa
    • Toronto
  • China
    • Beijing
    • Hong Kong
  • Luxembourg
  • Malaysia
  • Singapore
  • UK
    • Aberdeen
    • Birmingham
    • Cambridge
    • Edinburgh
    • Glasgow
    • London
    • Manchester
    • Oxford
Client liaison
  • Japan
  • Korea
Expertise
Services
  • Patents
  • Brands & Trade Marks
  • Designs
  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
  • Commercial IP & Contracts
  • Due Diligence
  • Freedom to Operate
  • EPO Patent Oppositions
  • European Patent Validations
  • Anti-counterfeiting
  • Open Source & Third Party Code
Sectors
  • Digital Transformation
    • 3D Printing
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Blockchain
    • Data & Connectivity
    • Extended Reality
    • Industry 4.0
  • Energy & Environment
  • Life Sciences
  • Agritech
  • Medical Technologies
  • Chemistry
  • Transport
  • Entertainment & Creative Industries
  • Food & Drink
  • Fashion & Retail
  • Universities & Research Bodies
  • Start-ups & Spin-outs
    • Creating value for start-ups
    • The IP driven start-up
  • Financial Services
About Us
  • Working with us
  • Awards
  • Corporate & Social Responsibility
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Careers
Insights
  • Articles
  • News
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Unified Patent Court hub
  • Beyond Brexit: European trade mark hub
  • M&C Reacts

COP26: What does carbon-neutrality mean for the UK's financial institutions?

04 November 2021
Michael Barrett
Print
Share

The announcement earlier this week that the UK is to become the world’s first “net zero aligned financial centre” has been widely reported across the UK media. The requirement for large financial institutions, among others, to demonstrate how they will meet their carbon neutral (or “net zero”) obligations is the government’s latest attempt to bring pressure to bear on the lending institutions to secure a greener future for us all.

While the banks’ role is instrumental to the policy of transitioning to a low carbon economy and they are expected to divert lending from fossil-fuel industries to cleaner greener alternatives, the regulations will also affect companies listed on the London Stock Exchange. But for many of these multinationals this is merely confirmation of the expected. Many have long been looking over their shoulder, Belshazzar-like, to read the writing on the wall but at the same time many have spotted an opportunity to enhance their marketing credentials.  Amazon, Microsoft, Starbucks, Unilever have all in the last 12 months trumpeted their carbon-neutral commitments, setting self-imposed deadlines for achieving these low-emission objectives. With the latest Treasury announcement, these plans will need to be published and made available no later than 2023. Big corporates can expect to be called to account.

But what does carbon-neutrality involve? In simple terms it can be thought of as ensuring that there is no net release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. This might involve a switch from fossil fuel energy to renewable energy or the purchase of carbon-offsets through investment in sustainability projects. Whatever the means employed, the companies involved are relishing the use of carbon neutrality to enhance their own positions.

Does registration of a trade mark have a role to play in communicating ethical objectives to stakeholders? Monopolising the use of words that support a business’ green credentials is certainly an attractive idea. The words CARBON NEUTRAL, for example, would be likely to be considered a descriptive term describing a characteristic of most goods or services supplied and therefore not registrable. However, the environmental consultant agency Natural Capital Partners has done just that, obtaining a (comparable) registration for CARBON NEUTRAL that covers, among others, tree planting services. Other marks that have achieved registration with inclusion of the term CARBON NEUTRAL are also to be found on the UK Trade Marks Register and in several cases this can be ascribed to the descriptive word elements being deftly combined with a distinctive graphic or additional distinctive word.  

However, strategies to exploit Carbon neutrality need to be handled carefully. Protestors at the Glasgow summit this week have reacted angrily to companies that claim green credentials but continue to harm the environment. So-called greenwashers will be likely to be called out with increasing frequency when the new regulations take effect. And who is to decide whether a CARBON NEUTRAL test has been satisfied anyway? No doubt these and other interesting questions will become the centre of debate as we head into 2022.

Next Story
  • Nike block MAX 1 for Verstappen
  • Cambridge: City of Innovation - The Oxford-Cambridge Innovation Arc
  • Cambridge: City of Innovation - The 'beer summit' that generated a genomic revolution
  • IP protection in collaborations: "Just Do It"
  • Peppa Pig v Wolfoo: clash of the cartoons
More insights

Latest Insights

Article
- 30 March 2023

That’s a wrap! CJEU confirms position on protection for designs dictated by technical function

"Think about the common sense answer and then it's probably something else!" - that's what I always say to anyone I'm training when they ask me a question about a specific piece of IP law.
Read more
Image: Nike Air Max
Article
- 30 March 2023

Nike block MAX 1 for Verstappen

Max Verstappen's plans to launch a MAX 1 clothing range have run into a roadblock, as Nike successfully oppose his Benelux trade mark application on the basis of their rights in AIR MAX. 
Read more
Chemistry
Article
- 24 March 2023

Preliminary position on priority published

As we reported in early 2022, the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the EPO are considering two pending referrals (G1/22 and G2/22) regarding the question of entitlement to priority. A hearing has now been set for 26 May 2023, and the Enlarged Board have now issued a preliminary opinion setting out the points to be discussed.
Read more
Marks & Clerk logo (white)
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Notice
  • Cookies
  • Legal Notices
  • Press Enquiries
  • Lexology
  • Mondaq